Caper11
Active VIP Member
Just checked my texts.....
You were in included in that conversation, I didn’t forget about you.
Just checked my texts.....
pics of your 121 x 1 on the side of a hill in the would be mighty fine ....
Would a guy be correct assuming the Polaris weight is with a pull start? Guessing adding a electric start would add +/- 15lbs.
-11.LBS with my earthX battery.
Where?
Your stock battery in a is 6.3 KG so about 13.5lbs. My earthX is 2.2 lbs or say 2.5. save 11lbs
Yes,.. where did you buy it from?
Electric start on a sled is not needed if it starts with a flick of the wrist, like Polaris. Even buddies T850 Doo started so easy when i pulled it from cold. Skidoos never used to pull over that easy. Yes I understand if it weighs nothing, might as well have it but with a weight penalty, forget it. I think the SHOT system still has a few pounds to it?
K ...guess like everyone you're getting older .... need a 850T 174 to haul your ass back where you went 20+ years ago on a much smaller sled ....Lmao! That was over 20years ago. Sleds were smaller and cameras were huge.
MaXi what happens when the GiRLFRieND finds ouT the POLARiS is LiGHTeR ,FasTER and FLiCKable ( 15 WiDE ) and buYs a POLARiS... Doo u StaY or Doo u Go !!! Hmm ... MeoW !!! WHos the Boss.. thaT new PuRPLE POLARiS Color sure is a nice ??? Does she become YouR WiFE and NoT YouR GiRLFRieND anyMoRE... LOLWhy? I ride my girlfriends sled LOL. She paid for it
K ...guess like everyone you're getting older .... need a 850T 174 to haul your ass back where you went 20+ years ago on a much smaller sled ....
For $hits and giggles you should pack a "small camera" and take one of those vintage sleds for a spin and grab a couple of snaps in the trees for posterity ....
Yep ...back on topic after a bit of harmless banter....2021 polaris sleds sure are nice eh???
31 lbs difference in dry weights N/A to N/A. 53 lbs difference from N/A to Turbo.
I liKe the way u THiNK ... Now leTs take ozone at 155 pounds and MaXi at lets saY 230 pounds what's the power to weight ratio now ... Hmm ok 1709 your turnNow lets look at the power to weight, if we take average elevation at Allen creek say 6200 feet, Hp lose is 3% per 1000 feet, 6x3 = 18% 165 Hp - 18% = 135HP
So 415 pounds divided by 135 = 3.07 pounds per HP
now the ski doo turbo 165HP @ 6200 feet, 468 pounds divided by 165 = 2.83 pounds per HP.
now these are ruff numbers, and why the turbos work good at elevation.
I liKe the way u THiNK ... Now leTs take ozone at 155 pounds and MaXi at Lets start at him being 230 pounds what's the power to weight ratio now ... Hmm ok 1709 your turn
I liKe the way u THiNK ... Now leTs take ozone at 155 pounds and MaXi at Lets start at him being 230 pounds what's the power to weight ratio now ... Hmm ok 1709 your turn
i know you, i think you got the weights mixed up LOL. But either way, your correct. The rider certainly has a big effect on the power to weight ratio. A lighter rider on an already lighter polaris could certainly perform very well
Ah ha...what u trying to say MaXi is YouR switching to POLARiS ... Now we r GeTTing To Know u ... LoL !!! HeY WeigHT I know u Meow !!! I LiKe the waY u THiNK ouTside POLARiS would be ProuD...should I taLK to YouR GiRLFrienD as she does all the sLed BuYing in your house hold ... Just KiDDing STuD ... HoTSAUCE !!! P.S 1709 The SLeDs don't drive THeM Selves ... KooLBeaNsi know you, i think you got the weights mixed up LOL. But either way, your correct. The rider certainly has a big effect on the power to weight ratio. A lighter rider on an already lighter polaris could certainly perform very well