its a doo maxwell. whats there to know? its the best and poo suck! end of story......The rzr crew is telling me its a dud? But they haven't driven it yet so I'm kind of in a hard place right now ya know. Who do you believe....
Sent from my BlackBerry 9780 using Tapatalk
101hp vs 82. enough saidLol sxs are new to me I want to know why this is so much different and worse than a rzr? They all look the same to me
Sent from my BlackBerry 9780 using Tapatalk
Wow thats alot of BRP flexing again.101hp vs 82. enough said
What I want to know, is how and where they found the power out of that 1000 so I can follow suit on my outlander lol. Looks impressive, I think brp got tired of people comparing the sporty rzr to a utility commander..
The RZR that weighs under 1000 lbs only has 52 hp. The RZR that has 88hp is 1200 lbs. Get yer sh!t straight.More to it than just HP guys. I'm not a huge Polaris fan either but the tale of the tape gives this one to the rzr. Yeah the maverick has 101hp vs the rzrs 88hp, but it weighs 300lbs more. The rear-mounted engine is a big plus for the rzr too, it keeps the front end light for skipping over obstacles and stops the rear end from kicking up high over jumps. The maverick has a much wider body as well, definitely a disadvantage for tight trails, and putting the driver and passenger farther apart causes mass centralization issues as well. But whatever they are just stats: I'm sure the BRP will be a blast to drive regardless. Both the rzr xp and maverick are too damn big for Canadian bush trails anyway.
You guys need to buy a can am and lets go riding. Enough key board chat. Let's go trail riding as see what works.
Can't tell how something works behind a computer.
Let's go.
Will you buy me a Maverick Ray? I'll go riding with you.