When are people going to realize, we dont have journalism in Canada anymore. All the MSM outlets are pumping out exactly what they've been paid to pump out.. how much money did the turd give to CBC? 800 million? And you think that it's not propaganda? Give your head a shake.
Going to drop the writ of election on Sunday
- Thread starter rknight111
- Start date
ctd
Active VIP Member
I actually believe that to be a positive thing & the more the better. The system is busted & part of reason is because no one questions & just accepts the way it is done.
retiredpop
Active VIP Member
I don't know how anyone can possibly vote for the Liberals after watching this. It was put out on June 24 by Michelle Rempel but needs to be shared again.
Kind
Active VIP Member
CBC ha stated they will leave the decision to get vaccinated up to the individual employees. That didn’t sound very Liberal of them. Only party promoting freedom of choice is the PPC.
tnc.news
CBC says vaccine is a “personal decision” for employees to make
CBC News has extensively given coverage to pro-mandatory vaccination views.
tnc.news
Kind
Active VIP Member
Lol to save the people’s time O’Toole will now carbon copy the liberals platform. ***relax I’m just joking***
/https://www.thestar.com/content/dam/thestar/politics/federal/2021/09/05/otoole-flips-positions-on-guns-says-he-would-maintain-liberals-banned-firearms-list/erin_o_toole.jpg)
www.thestar.com
O’Toole flips positions on guns, says he would maintain Liberals’ banned firearms list
Conservative leader says he would maintain 2020 restrictions on firearms brought in by the Liberals, contrary to his party’s platform.
snopro
Active VIP Member
Have you missed all the post on the actual clarification?. I'll explain again. He is talking about "continuing" the ban on real assault weapons that were banned in 1977. Military grade, fully automatic rifles that we can't buy anymore for 40 years. The problem with the mix up is the media can't keep up.Lol to save the people’s time O’Toole will now carbon copy the liberals platform. ***relax I’m just joking***
O’Toole flips positions on guns, says he would maintain Liberals’ banned firearms list
Conservative leader says he would maintain 2020 restrictions on firearms brought in by the Liberals, contrary to his party’s platform.
Kind
Active VIP Member
I don’t believe any gun should be illegal. All that should be required is proper training and registration. I more then likely missed the part where O’Toole said he would repeal the complete invasion of privacy part of our current firearms act.
snopro
Active VIP Member
Ok I will admit I'm wrong when I am. I apologize. He has it appears by a number of news sources to have flip flopped on this and will in fact leave the status quo pending an investigation into current fire arm laws and talking to people in the industry and police chiefs. I have sent an email to my MP to get clarification and explain to him this is a hot topic for me. I know Martin well and I know he will respond. I immediately went to the CCFR Facebook page and Tracey Wilson who is one of the 3 main players with that gun lobby group is telling everyone "to calm down #politics". Its also reported the NFA and Sheldon Clare have registered as a third party advertiser and have donated over $400,000 to the Conservative Party. The CBC has said they believe there is a deal with O'Toole and the gun lobby and questioned him on it and he walked around the question not unlike what the Turd does all the time. I'll report back when I hear back from Martin and let everyone know what he tells me.
Kind
Active VIP Member
Kind
Active VIP Member
Caper11
Active VIP Member
Proper training???, yep join the military than.
Because that’s definitely a matter of opinion.
I do not believe you would be able to handle a 30caliber or 7.62 with 30 in the mag sitting down let alone standing up, at full rock and roll.
So yes, I do believe some rifles should not be available to the general public.
Kind
Active VIP Member
Are you able to comment without being condescending? I never said certain guns shouldn’t require certain levels of training. Just like not everyone should just hop in a 1000hp car when all they’ve ever driven was a stock smart car. There is nothing wrong with a graduated system.
SUMMIT TREE
Active VIP Member
Yeah, I can agree to that! As someone who has been lucky enough to shoot some Full Auto machine guns, I will certainly attest that they are not all for everyone. I was surprised at how much push some of those guns have! Im 265 lbs 6’5, I expected it to push, I was leaned heavily into it and it still nearly pushed me over backwards. Hence why the range officer stands behind you with his hand out to act as a bump stop. Lol. Its fuggin Awesome Firepower!!
SUMMIT TREE
Active VIP Member
Shot a Barret 50 as well, and honestly a full auto shooting a .308 has way more wow factor. Now, a “regular” .50 without all the fancy Muzzle brake and floating barrel might be a real hoot to try and hang onto! Like a “ma Duce” or something
Kind
Active VIP Member
Caper11
Active VIP Member
Again that’s the pot calling the kettle black.
Do you have a hard time with certain things, and being challenged???
You said you don’t believe any gun should be illegal, and training is needed. Join the military if you want the proper training on how to handle a full auto rifle.
Your comment comes from a obvious lack of experience with them. There is a huge difference between a full auto rifle and a car, pretty poor comparison.
Last edited:
Similar threads
