Sooooo........anyone weigh the new sleds yet?

Boostmonkey

Active VIP Member
Joined
Oct 11, 2009
Messages
215
Reaction score
184
Location
Salmon Arm BC
Not sure what the truck scales are like in your neck of the woods but here they go by Kg's and only in increments of 10kg, so I really don’t think they are sensitive enough to satisfy most of the peeps on this site.

JMO

BM
 

X-it

Active VIP Member
Joined
Jan 8, 2007
Messages
7,468
Reaction score
16,853
Location
Prince George
I can remember waiting for polaris sleds to cool down on the trails way back in the 90's. I thought they solved this by now. Are their cranks fixed?
 

mach123

Active VIP Member
Joined
Jan 22, 2008
Messages
2,005
Reaction score
762
Location
St. Albert
The poo's should be lighter, they use haif the material to build it and like maxwell said half a cooler......hmmmmmmmmmmmmmmm
 

yammyboy

Active VIP Member
Joined
Oct 13, 2011
Messages
316
Reaction score
185
Location
Fort st john
If your taking to me I got this info from a sledding magazine has nothing to do with a truck scale
 

Boostmonkey

Active VIP Member
Joined
Oct 11, 2009
Messages
215
Reaction score
184
Location
Salmon Arm BC
If your taking to me I got this info from a sledding magazine has nothing to do with a truck scale

No I didn’t intend the post for you. Sorry for the confusion.


Nice sleds!! A real weight comparison IMO should be all fluids full. It would be cool if yah can get to a truck scale and weigh both of them. There is no doubt that the pro is lighter I'm kind of curious on how much.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

Post was meant for ^^^.

BM
 

climbmax

Team Thunderstruck
Joined
Aug 18, 2008
Messages
751
Reaction score
4,355
Location
Big Mountains of BC
hmmm.......good read. I always "thought" these things were "lightweight". 575 full is pretty close to 6 hundy with your jerry can strapped on. ;)
Braaaaappppp
RS
 

Canuk

Active VIP Member
Joined
Nov 13, 2008
Messages
440
Reaction score
139
Location
Edmonton
My pro did heat up once last spring. I thought I could get away without scratchers on the trail. Guess not. I dont like to drive fast on trails.

Then again, my cat wouldn't make it up the trail without scratchers either.
Wait... my 08 xp needed them too (don't know about the etec though).
 

Shredder

Active VIP Member
Joined
Dec 4, 2006
Messages
2,623
Reaction score
2,881
Location
Grande Cache AB
This thread is awesome!!!! Last year it was the too heavy, too wide ProClimb that was gonna get it's ass handed to it on the hill by the featherweight ProRMK......then the snow flew, and we never did see a stock RMK lay a beating on a (my) ProClimb. From a guy that has no skin in the Doo/Poo battle.............. the 2013 XM will out climb the 2013 RMK; no matter who the scale says should win, you heard it here first. :beer:
 

+SLEDWRECKS+

Active VIP Member
Joined
Sep 27, 2012
Messages
502
Reaction score
1,111
Location
Sylvan Lake
i just remembered something. doesnt the pro rmk have an extrememly small cooling system? ie very small rear cooler loop? hence why im always waiting for them to cool down on the trail in the spring? this can also account for 15+lbs no problem. again just one of those items that may not matter to someone.

View attachment 140324

is that cooler full tunnel width or is it a small loop running down each edge?

A few inches wide on either side
Cooler.jpg
 

deaner

Active VIP Member
Joined
Nov 6, 2008
Messages
3,221
Reaction score
11,163
Location
Creston, BC
Yeah thats hard to believe the wet weight in that magazine? But it will be interesting to see some real numbers from guys on here that can weigh both of them objectively. It is interesting to see the difference from dry to wet weight.

Either way, I think we as consumers are winning big time. I honestly dont know which of the three I would buy if I were buying today. Each one has its goods and bads......but 10 years ago it probably would have cost 30k or more to get the hp and wieght we are getting stock now.
 

snopro

Active VIP Member
Joined
Mar 3, 2009
Messages
103,322
Reaction score
94,067
Location
Milo,Alberta
American Snowmobiler could post that the Doo was lightest and I wouldn't buy that rag. I too am skeptical of the Pro weighing 160 more pounds wet.
 

trench

Active VIP Member
Joined
Nov 29, 2010
Messages
953
Reaction score
731
Location
Sturgeon County, Alberta
I think that number must be a typo,maybe 517 pds wet? We have 4 Pros in our riding group, no issues on the trail as long as the scratchers are down.
 

etecheaven

Active VIP Member
Joined
Jan 13, 2011
Messages
538
Reaction score
990
Location
Boyle, Alberta
i love this battle.... on and on... feels like the middle east.

Id perfer to ride a sled that i dont have to be a pro to destroy those hills. The xm will make good riders great and thats worth 50 pounds.
 

Canuk

Active VIP Member
Joined
Nov 13, 2008
Messages
440
Reaction score
139
Location
Edmonton
WOW where is the cooling system, hmmmmmmmmmmmmm another 15lbs saved.

D.
Come to the dark side. I know you secretly want to. But seriously, if you are getting an XM I would love to spend some time on your sled again.
 

leadfoot33

Active VIP Member
Joined
Jan 10, 2011
Messages
388
Reaction score
225
Location
prince george BC
the 2012 pro rmk with electric start was 1 lb heavier than the cat in one of the mags i bought. wet for wet. (electric start weighed i think 15-25 lbs?)
 
Top Bottom