What would you rather have?

[Longhairfreak]

A sled with a 162x3 in with a 35 mph track speed or a 162x2 in with a 70 mph track speed?

 

[tnt-salvage]

i think it should be 162 3" 50 mph and 162 2" 70mph, i dont think the extra inch will cut the speed in half. i could be wrong tho. and would you not think the guy would re-gear and clutch for the change in track? seems like a waste of money imo

 

[d mills]

I would be fine with either...as long as its underneath a machine that looks like the lead float at a gay pride parade....

 

[Chrisco]

Ill take the 3 inch in 2 feet of pow anyday. but if ur sitting at the hill climb all day Ill take the 2.5. Last year in dec with 2 feet me and troy side by side him at 10 lbs with a 2.5 163 and me with a 3 174 with a pipe.

 

[maxwell]

Ill take the 3 inch in 2 feet of pow anyday. but if ur sitting at the hill climb all day Ill take the 2.5. Last year in dec with 2 feet me and troy side by side him at 10 lbs with a 2.5 163 and me with a 3 174 with a pipe.

For sure. Ill take less track speed and more traction in the deep technical stuff any day.

 

[1100]

When I had my 1100 I went from a 2.25 to a 3" when they first came out and I know which one will take me higher up a hill, for LHF an the prairie riding he's been doing I would prefer the 2" with higher track speed

 

[Longhairfreak]

When I had my 1100 I went from a 2.25 to a 3" when they first came out and I know which one will take me higher up a hill, for LHF an the prairie riding he's been doing I would prefer the 2" with higher track speed

2.25 were horrible tracks. And for the prairies I like 100 mph track speed.

 

[1100]

So which track do you prefer LHF? I miss having the slider life I did with the 2.25 though.

 

[pistonbroke800]

I heard from a really good source on here a few years back that the '89 Phazer is your best option for obtaining 100mph speeds