9105 or 9175 C/E for the pro 163

[SCRUBZ]

Just looking for any info on the straight cut C/E to the old style C/E. What would be better for playin in the trees and deep pow (Im talkin REVY pow). Or is it worth the moeny???

 

[HotShotHarry]

The 9105 is a 15 by 163, 2.86 pitch. The 9175 is a 15 by 162, 3" pitch. Both tracks have 2.5" lugs. The 3" pitch track would require a driver change. Perhaps you mean the new PEAK track? I personally do not have any experience with the PEAK track but do know of someone who tried it on a Pro and did not care for it. I run the 9105m on my Pro and like it. The only better track IMO would be the 3" paddle track,but then you would have track speeds to deal with.

 

[SCRUBZ]

Ya im aware of the 3.0 pitch I will be changing drivers regardless there is also a mod that needs done to the chaincase. Im just wondering if the new style design is better then the old style cause I heard from a reliable sourse that the new design is not as good??? Just wondering if anyone has run the new style C/E on a pro and if its even worth doing?

 

[ASSAULTrmk]

I run a 155 CE old style & love it buddy has peak on 163. It throws ice & snow out the back on the trail like theirs no tomorow but did get to try it out and performed awesome in lots of powder compared to mine but it's a 163 & runs on av fuel !!!!

 

[polaris011]

scubz if you are still looking for info go see john leginus if anyone would know that guy would and he lives in your backyard