Xm can thread

mach123

Active VIP Member
Joined
Jan 22, 2008
Messages
2,005
Reaction score
762
Location
St. Albert
John T no cover for me anymore, have a nice enclosed and stays nice and clean. LOL
Im in for group buy for the 2013, let me know
 

deaner

Active VIP Member
Joined
Nov 6, 2008
Messages
3,217
Reaction score
11,149
Location
Creston, BC
It surprises me that there is any difference between all of the cans? Isnt the only variable the restriction size at the exit of the can? Every type is going to sound difference, but I just dont see how different designs can affect performance that much assuming they use the same restrictor size?
 

thegeneral

Active VIP Member
Joined
Nov 21, 2009
Messages
2,158
Reaction score
2,596
Location
Stony Plain, Alberta
:jerry:
It surprises me that there is any difference between all of the cans? Isnt the only variable the restriction size at the exit of the can? Every type is going to sound difference, but I just dont see how different designs can affect performance that much assuming they use the same restrictor size?
 

takethebounce

Active VIP Member
Joined
Dec 10, 2008
Messages
5,193
Reaction score
8,750
Location
calgary
It surprises me that there is any difference between all of the cans? Isnt the only variable the restriction size at the exit of the can? Every type is going to sound difference, but I just dont see how different designs can affect performance that much assuming they use the same restrictor size?

The problem is, they don't all use the same size anything. Different length, diameter, different material used for the stinger, different packing density, and so on.

I haven't run the HPS on the etecs, but on the R's we found them to be too tight and did have some squeeks on the sleds that ran the HPS.

On the etec's could be a different story.

Jaw's have a nice bark, not to loud. SLP seems to work best with full SLP setup.

All of that could change with the ECM calibration changes they did for 2013.
 

Teth-Air

Active VIP Member
Joined
Oct 16, 2008
Messages
3,756
Reaction score
7,992
Location
Calgary/Nelson
Posted by Maxwell

"The only can that works. Hps."



But it only works in the meadows and straight up climbs : )
 

maxwell

Active VIP Member
Joined
Apr 25, 2007
Messages
19,941
Reaction score
42,221
Location
Sherwood Park, Alberta, Canada
The problem is, they don't all use the same size anything. Different length, diameter, different material used for the stinger, different packing density, and so on.

I haven't run the HPS on the etecs, but on the R's we found them to be too tight and did have some squeeks on the sleds that ran the HPS.

On the etec's could be a different story.

Jaw's have a nice bark, not to loud. SLP seems to work best with full SLP setup.

All of that could change with the ECM calibration changes they did for 2013.

That's why I like it. Essentially leans out the sled. to what I feel is a safe level. Sled runs cleaner. Crisper and better. Ptek and etec in my experience. But obviously didn't work for you lol

Sent from my BlackBerry 9780 using Tapatalk
 

Chrisco

Active VIP Member
Joined
Mar 28, 2007
Messages
2,478
Reaction score
6,038
Location
Stony Plain
Let me know If anyone wants a HPS can I have some comming as we speek, I can have more put in the box. The HPS cans are a sweet, clean, piece of work. (SEA J-2567 sound test approved@88 dbs HP+3.6 WEIGHT LOSS -14.5 LBS)

Please call 780-963-0080
 

YFZ 450

Active member
Joined
Sep 18, 2007
Messages
71
Reaction score
126
Location
Beaumont
Hello
I want one I will be back in country on the 15 Oct. Any price ?
Thanks
 

SUPERDUTY

Active member
Joined
Oct 15, 2007
Messages
105
Reaction score
59
Location
BC
maybe a group buy for snow and mud members.....price too
 

Dmf

Active VIP Member
Joined
Oct 17, 2010
Messages
371
Reaction score
398
Location
Grande Prairie
That's why I like it. Essentially leans out the sled. to what I feel is a safe level. Sled runs cleaner. Crisper and better. Ptek and etec in my experience. But obviously didn't work for you lol

Sent from my BlackBerry 9780 using Tapatalk

does anyone have any legit dyno runs on the same sled with different cans? how can you say the hps is the best?
 

snopro

Active VIP Member
Joined
Mar 3, 2009
Messages
102,943
Reaction score
93,273
Location
Milo,Alberta
does anyone have any legit dyno runs on the same sled with different cans? how can you say the hps is the best?

I know that BRP did dyno testing on cans in 2007 for the 800R engine and published the results in there 1 day service book. They tested 5 cans and the MBRPcan was the only one that didn't lose horsepower. Haven't seen anything on the ETEC cans yet.
 

popcorn popper

Active VIP Member
Joined
Nov 26, 2008
Messages
464
Reaction score
511
Location
central alberta
I know that BRP did dyno testing on cans in 2007 for the 800R engine and published the results in there 1 day service book. They tested 5 cans and the MBRPcan was the only one that didn't lose horsepower. Haven't seen anything on the ETEC cans yet.

Snopro did this include Jaws??You know on the tugwheeler it was the only one that didn't lose power!!And you know how I am with Brand loyalty,not like some of these ship jumpers????!!!:smiliestirthepot::rant:
 

snopro

Active VIP Member
Joined
Mar 3, 2009
Messages
102,943
Reaction score
93,273
Location
Milo,Alberta
I'll get back to you on that Mr. Mayor. Memory ain't as sharp as it used to be if you know what I mean?
 
Top Bottom