Eldereldo
Active VIP Member
Edit: alright the general consensus is "you screwed up, get over it and fix your mistake". So accepting that, and that I am going to have to rebuild the motor, probably from the crank up since the bottom end is probably damaged, give me some idea of what that might cost. And what I should be checking as the reason for the piston scoring.
So I had a problem with my 2014 Arctic Cat, ran it out of oil one ride. In my defense I did check the oil level before heading out, but it wasn't very light and on the Cat you have to look at a sight glass and decide if it is covered with oil or not as the oil tank is solid metal. However they also have a low oil warning light that is supposed to illuminate once you get down to a tank of gas, worth of oil. That never came on. We eventually figured out what had happened and siphoned oil over from another sled to get back home,but after that the engine was way harder to pull over. So I took it into my dealer, told them what happened they checked the motor and determined that one of the cylinders was scored and they put in a warranty claim.
That just came back denied because the sled had an after market can on it, and the warranty company( not Arctic Cat, this was the extended warrantiy) said that the can caused the issue. so I asked them how they determined that and they said that it was because it was aftermarket and any aftermarket parts voided the warranty. I pointed out that the clause said that the warranty was void if the damage could be attributed to the aftermarket part, so how were they proving it was the can. The reply was that all cans change the back pressure and therefore any damage would have been caused by it.
Seems to me that isn't proof, just a excuse to get out of paying for the repair. And that the actual damage wasn't caused by the can,but by running out of oil because the low warning light did not work. But they said there was no evidence of that because it would have caused overheating and wouldn't have effected just one cylinder. Not sure why the can would have affected just one cylinder either then but they just kept saying the warranty was void because I had an after market can so I gave up on taking to them.
Before I take this to a friend who is a lawyer and ask him to deal with it, wanted to find out how many people out there have had issues with their motors being damaged by cans, and who has seen a warranty claim denied because they had one installed and finally whether you think it is more likely the oil issue, or a can caused this.
So I had a problem with my 2014 Arctic Cat, ran it out of oil one ride. In my defense I did check the oil level before heading out, but it wasn't very light and on the Cat you have to look at a sight glass and decide if it is covered with oil or not as the oil tank is solid metal. However they also have a low oil warning light that is supposed to illuminate once you get down to a tank of gas, worth of oil. That never came on. We eventually figured out what had happened and siphoned oil over from another sled to get back home,but after that the engine was way harder to pull over. So I took it into my dealer, told them what happened they checked the motor and determined that one of the cylinders was scored and they put in a warranty claim.
That just came back denied because the sled had an after market can on it, and the warranty company( not Arctic Cat, this was the extended warrantiy) said that the can caused the issue. so I asked them how they determined that and they said that it was because it was aftermarket and any aftermarket parts voided the warranty. I pointed out that the clause said that the warranty was void if the damage could be attributed to the aftermarket part, so how were they proving it was the can. The reply was that all cans change the back pressure and therefore any damage would have been caused by it.
Seems to me that isn't proof, just a excuse to get out of paying for the repair. And that the actual damage wasn't caused by the can,but by running out of oil because the low warning light did not work. But they said there was no evidence of that because it would have caused overheating and wouldn't have effected just one cylinder. Not sure why the can would have affected just one cylinder either then but they just kept saying the warranty was void because I had an after market can so I gave up on taking to them.
Before I take this to a friend who is a lawyer and ask him to deal with it, wanted to find out how many people out there have had issues with their motors being damaged by cans, and who has seen a warranty claim denied because they had one installed and finally whether you think it is more likely the oil issue, or a can caused this.
Last edited: