2017 Polaris Live Unveiling

pistoncontracting

Active VIP Member
Joined
Feb 8, 2012
Messages
1,010
Reaction score
1,842
Location
On the edge
It is a couple of years too late though... I am thinking that the 174 isn't going to be such an outstanding market anymore though.

I'm curious why you think that? Because there sure seemed to be a lot of hurt feeling that Doo didn't offer it in the 850. I'm willing to bet had Doo offered it in the 850, it would still be better then sliced bread to the blind faithful.

I'm not blown away by the new Poo either, but I think saying they showed up with a 174 late, and ignoring a few of doos new changes as not being 'late' is just stupid. Very typical mind you.
 

QuintinG

Active VIP Member
Joined
Apr 24, 2011
Messages
775
Reaction score
746
Location
Edmonton, Alberta, Canada
Why is the axys 174 have a ski stance of 39-41"? Do the shorter versions of the axys have the same ski stance or is it somewhere around 36-38"?
If it's wider I wonder what the purpose would be.

Also it says it has a chain case? I thought polaris went to belt drive a couple years ago? Or is the belt drive only available with the shorter track too?
 

rightsideup

Active VIP Member
Joined
May 19, 2008
Messages
3,021
Reaction score
2,833
Location
bc
Why is the axys 174 have a ski stance of 39-41"? Do the shorter versions of the axys have the same ski stance or is it somewhere around 36-38"?
If it's wider I wonder what the purpose would be.

Also it says it has a chain case? I thought polaris went to belt drive a couple years ago? Or is the belt drive only available with the shorter track too?
Polaris's believe is that the wider stance helps cut into the hill when sidehilling and is on all models regardless of length. The 3 inch track comes with a chain case regardless of length and I am surprised that was not changed for 2017
 

Bnorth

Active VIP Member
Joined
Dec 18, 2010
Messages
10,547
Reaction score
20,128
Location
Salmon Arm
Great looking machine. I would love to see the 174 do a pull beside the new doo 165.
 

Cat401

Active VIP Member
Joined
Dec 27, 2008
Messages
3,115
Reaction score
8,290
Location
Waskatenau, Alberta
Great looking machine. I would love to see the 174 do a pull beside the new doo 165.

Maybe it's just the angle of the pictures that I have seen but it appears the Polaris track paddles are right up to the edge and the Doo paddles look like they are inset a bit so the 16" may only be a 15"????

Or all they all designed that way - - with the paddles inset a bit?
 

neilsleder

Active VIP Member
Joined
Oct 18, 2009
Messages
9,618
Reaction score
17,001
Location
Leduc Alberta
Maybe it's just the angle of the pictures that I have seen but it appears the Polaris track paddles are right up to the edge and the Doo paddles look like they are inset a bit so the 16" may only be a 15"????

Or all they all designed that way - - with the paddles inset a bit?

I know after market tracks the lugs are in. Can't recall the stock tracks


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
 

etecheaven

Active VIP Member
Joined
Jan 13, 2011
Messages
538
Reaction score
990
Location
Boyle, Alberta
Kinda what i expected.....seeing how they had a big release last year. Anyone know how the power to weight comparisons match up?
 

PolarisAssault91

Active member
Joined
Oct 5, 2012
Messages
61
Reaction score
68
Location
Chilliwack BC
Great looking machine. I would love to see the 174 do a pull beside the new doo 165.
Don't think that will be a comparison. 165 wouldn't come close I don't think. Apples to apples. Be Nice to see both 74s pull a hill though My stock 63 wouldn't touch a 74 doo mark..

Sent from my SM-G920W8 using Tapatalk
 

teeroy

Active VIP Member
Joined
Oct 7, 2007
Messages
9,100
Reaction score
14,101
Location
Roma, Alberta
The 3 inch track comes with a chain case regardless of length and I am surprised that was not changed for 2017
they can't get the proper gear ratios with a belt drive on the 3" tracks, the lower pulley is too big and hangs below the pan too far.
 

QuintinG

Active VIP Member
Joined
Apr 24, 2011
Messages
775
Reaction score
746
Location
Edmonton, Alberta, Canada
Polaris's believe is that the wider stance helps cut into the hill when sidehilling and is on all models regardless of length. The 3 inch track comes with a chain case regardless of length and I am surprised that was not changed for 2017

So they don't want to put their belt drive on a track with 3" lugs? That seems strange to me as there is lots of aftermarket belt drives on 3" tracks on all different brands over the last while. This new axys is looking pretty nice but I don't like that you don't get the better technology with the belt drive on the best sleds. Same thing as skidoo not putting the 850 in the 174. It's like the manufacturers don't want to give the customers "everything" all in one package.
 

neilsleder

Active VIP Member
Joined
Oct 18, 2009
Messages
9,618
Reaction score
17,001
Location
Leduc Alberta
So they don't want to put their belt drive on a track with 3" lugs? That seems strange to me as there is lots of aftermarket belt drives on 3" tracks on all different brands over the last while. This new axys is looking pretty nice but I don't like that you don't get the better technology with the belt drive on the best sleds. Same thing as skidoo not putting the 850 in the 174. It's like the manufacturers don't want to give the customers "everything" all in one package.

If they have you everything you wanted one year, they wouldn't sell any sleds the next year. This way it keeps people coming back and buying new


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
 

CUSO

Active VIP Member
Joined
Jan 21, 2007
Messages
4,771
Reaction score
5,522
Location
Edmonton
I say that because I hear from lots of people first hand that they are going back to the 154/163 from their 174's. 154-ish length is the most fun, if you ride tight trees.


Doo does what it can to stay on top without putting ALL their cards on the table.

Actually I think the main reason is because they didn't have the time to change their WHOLE production line in one year. It's not like they just bolt on a skid and slap on a track. Re-tooling is involved.

I'm curious why you think that? Because there sure seemed to be a lot of hurt feeling that Doo didn't offer it in the 850. I'm willing to bet had Doo offered it in the 850, it would still be better then sliced bread to the blind faithful.

I'm not blown away by the new Poo either, but I think saying they showed up with a 174 late, and ignoring a few of doos new changes as not being 'late' is just stupid. Very typical mind you.
 

CUSO

Active VIP Member
Joined
Jan 21, 2007
Messages
4,771
Reaction score
5,522
Location
Edmonton
Track width for floatation, Lugs are for traction. The doo has a tapered tunnel, so Im guessing that is why.

Maybe it's just the angle of the pictures that I have seen but it appears the Polaris track paddles are right up to the edge and the Doo paddles look like they are inset a bit so the 16" may only be a 15"????

Or all they all designed that way - - with the paddles inset a bit?
 

sledneck_03

Active VIP Member
Joined
Nov 20, 2008
Messages
2,356
Reaction score
1,571
Location
saskatoon
So they don't want to put their belt drive on a track with 3" lugs? That seems strange to me as there is lots of aftermarket belt drives on 3" tracks on all different brands over the last while. This new axys is looking pretty nice but I don't like that you don't get the better technology with the belt drive on the best sleds. Same thing as skidoo not putting the 850 in the 174. It's like the manufacturers don't want to give the customers "everything" all in one package.

It is strange. Its like they didnt want to take any chances with the aluminum drift shaft and the belt drive with the big 3" after the 2013 problems.

I know people that have 3" tracks on their 2.6" axys sleds and the belt drive is fine.

If history repeats its self, there will be big changes to the line up next year and hopefully a 3" belt drive is it as well as 36" stance.
 

kovs

Active VIP Member
Joined
Apr 12, 2009
Messages
802
Reaction score
1,048
Location
Rosetown, sask
Don't think that will be a comparison. 165 wouldn't come close I don't think. Apples to apples. Be Nice to see both 74s pull a hill though My stock 63 wouldn't touch a 74 doo mark..

Sent from my SM-G920W8 using Tapatalk

Pretty sure Dave norona said that the 174 couldn't touch the line the 165 laid down when they were out riding them. Up hill deep pow pull
That was from video he did at the unveil


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
 

PolarisAssault91

Active member
Joined
Oct 5, 2012
Messages
61
Reaction score
68
Location
Chilliwack BC
Pretty sure Dave norona said that the 174 couldn't touch the line the 165 laid down when they were out riding them. Up hill deep pow pull
That was from video he did at the unveil


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
Marketing...blah blah. I wouldn't want to admit a new release being out hill climbed by its predecessor either.. Time will tell.. Believe it when I see it.

Sent from my SM-G920W8 using Tapatalk
 
Top Bottom