jpgmtech
Active VIP Member
- Joined
- Jan 17, 2012
- Messages
- 339
- Reaction score
- 866
- Location
- Drayton Valley
- Website
- www.payntonperformance.com
Just looking through spec sheets, found something interesting:
2011 to 2013 Summit X Weights:
154 track - 459lbs
163 track - 464lbs
2010 Summit X:
154 track - 446lbs
163 track - 452lbs
2008 to 2009 Summit X:
154 track - 429lbs
163 track - 434lbs
I know the tracks have changed. Also know that the e-tecs are slightly heavier powerplants (I've been told 5lbs but don't know how accurate that is...)
Bottom line is, the 2012 Pro RMK 155 claimed dry weight of 431 lbs - us Doo boys had beat with 429lbs back in 2008, if the literature is to be totally trusted. And, if the literature is to be trusted, we can take a 2009 Summit X, put an aftermarket belt drive and lightweight exhaust can on it and bring weight lower the new RMK's claimed 417 lbs, all while still making more horsepower than the Polaris with the 800 Powertek R.
Interesting...
2011 to 2013 Summit X Weights:
154 track - 459lbs
163 track - 464lbs
2010 Summit X:
154 track - 446lbs
163 track - 452lbs
2008 to 2009 Summit X:
154 track - 429lbs
163 track - 434lbs
I know the tracks have changed. Also know that the e-tecs are slightly heavier powerplants (I've been told 5lbs but don't know how accurate that is...)
Bottom line is, the 2012 Pro RMK 155 claimed dry weight of 431 lbs - us Doo boys had beat with 429lbs back in 2008, if the literature is to be totally trusted. And, if the literature is to be trusted, we can take a 2009 Summit X, put an aftermarket belt drive and lightweight exhaust can on it and bring weight lower the new RMK's claimed 417 lbs, all while still making more horsepower than the Polaris with the 800 Powertek R.
Interesting...
Last edited: