Need help deciding between 155" or 163" track

Braedend

Member
Joined
Sep 9, 2009
Messages
16
Reaction score
36
Location
edmonton
Hey guys,
I'm looking to snow check a new rmk pro this year. I'm having trouble making up my mind between the 163 and 155 track. I have heard mixed reviews that the step up from the 155 to 63 isn't all that worth it on the pros. I am in the mountains quite often I don't do alot of high marking. We do mostly tree riding.

Thanks ahead of time for the help!

Braeden
 

polaris011

Active VIP Member
Joined
Nov 18, 2010
Messages
666
Reaction score
692
Location
olds ab
you notice it big time when there is lots of fresh snow ...for what it cost get the biggest track you can
 

polarisdragon800

Active VIP Member
Joined
Jul 25, 2011
Messages
6,018
Reaction score
1,426
Location
Stauffer, AB
noo...? maybe on a polaris i am not sure...? any other brand there is no comparison the 163 rules in all situations.

Ok. Have just read a few posts on here about some 163 having to poach a 155's track to get where the 155 was. I do agrees though they rule in all situations, you have time to slow down an think in the trees instead of having to pin it to stay on top:


Sent from my mobile telephone
 

MATTIAC

Active VIP Member
Joined
Jan 8, 2011
Messages
2,608
Reaction score
2,591
Location
Lake Country BC/Fort Mcmurray
Ok. Have just read a few posts on here about some 163 having to poach a 155's track to get where the 155 was. I do agrees though they rule in all situations, you have time to slow down an think in the trees instead of having to pin it to stay on top:


Sent from my mobile telephone

Had a pro rmk 155 poaching my track to out climb my track in sugar bowl. Looked so cool for his buddies
 

polarisdragon800

Active VIP Member
Joined
Jul 25, 2011
Messages
6,018
Reaction score
1,426
Location
Stauffer, AB
ya i remember that thread. but incresed traction + increased surface area = better performance in most snow conditions.

Ok yea my next will be a 163, just wasn't sure about the climbing vs. the shorter tracks. Arean't you running a 174?


Sent from my mobile telephone
 

jasoncaville

Active member
Joined
Apr 9, 2010
Messages
100
Reaction score
320
Location
Elkford
I have a 2012 Pro 163 and do a lot of tree riding. The 163 is what you want if you ride in deep powder. It doesn't seem too long. I've heard that the 155 can be more fun in terms of ski lift but you can adjust your suspension and get the 163 to lift too.
 

polarisdragon800

Active VIP Member
Joined
Jul 25, 2011
Messages
6,018
Reaction score
1,426
Location
Stauffer, AB
I have a 2012 Pro 163 and do a lot of tree riding. The 163 is what you want if you ride in deep powder. It doesn't seem too long. I've heard that the 155 can be more fun in terms of ski lift but you can adjust your suspension and get the 163 to lift too.

Yep, limiter straps


Sent from my mobile telephone
 
Top Bottom