jhurkot
Active VIP Member
The greenies will ignore all those estimates because they don’t want the negative publicity for the wind farms, and most of them own cats.
Haha yeah. I have 6 cats.
The greenies will ignore all those estimates because they don’t want the negative publicity for the wind farms, and most of them own cats.
Haha yeah. I have 6 cats.
Seven years warmest on record Ever recorded. Nope. Not even close.
blob:https://www.snowandmud.com/c6270f92-bf86-4815-8993-e6be7a447e5aView attachment 233554
Don’t trust anything called “World ————- ———— organization. All leads to UN.
https://youtu.be/GUJMj6xQ6Ew
There must be something special about emissions from communist nations, China in particular, that they're seldom called out in any of these types of far-fetched, disaster scenario "documentaries", not that I have the strong stomach required to watch many of them. Mostly North Americans need to figuratively and collectively cut off their dicks to save the planet. That must be the reason behind the huge efforts underway to take away our rights and freedoms.....communist emissions are A-okay.
China is called out the world over for their pollution and responsibility for their large carbon emissions. The problem is per capita their emissions are smaller than almost every western nation, and that gets thrown back every time it's brought up. Not that China gives a crap about about anything democratic nations say about them anyway.
I'm a big believer in moving manufacturing back to western nations and funneling less money to China, which would also bring this manufacturing under modern environmental control. There are a number of major reasons to limit China's influence on the world, in my mind the environmental aspect is minor though in comparison to the un-democratic, authoritarian, communistic plague that is the Chinese regime. The problem is you will never convince the Wal-Mart crowd that it's beneficial to pay double or triple for a locally manufactured product, even if the product supports the national economy and lasts twice or three times as long.
That figure in itself is one of the biggest piles of Bullcr*p dreamed up by the eco-terrorists. Just because you have overpopulated your country doesn't mean you are somehow better because you can divide the total by x number of people.
China is called out the world over for their pollution and responsibility for their large carbon emissions. The problem is per capita their emissions are smaller than almost every western nation, and that gets thrown back every time it's brought up. Not that China gives a crap about about anything democratic nations say about them anyway.
I'm a big believer in moving manufacturing back to western nations and funneling less money to China, which would also bring this manufacturing under modern environmental control. There are a number of major reasons to limit China's influence on the world, in my mind the environmental aspect is minor though in comparison to the un-democratic, authoritarian, communistic plague that is the Chinese regime. The problem is you will never convince the Wal-Mart crowd that it's beneficial to pay double or triple for a locally manufactured product, even if the product supports the national economy and lasts twice or three times as long.