Weight of NEW 2012 Pro Climb turbo 162" !!!!!!!!

geordiep

Active member
Joined
Apr 25, 2007
Messages
131
Reaction score
121
Location
Calgary
Weights from same scale taken pre-season. All sleds ready to ride (full fuel, oils, coolant) :
Snowest Source: The Big Pre-Season Weigh-In - SnoWest Snowmobile Forum

2012 Polaris 155" 600 Pro (electric start): 567.1
2011 Polaris 155" 800 rmk (non-pro): 552.5 (Pro is only 15 lbs less I hear)
2009 Ski-Doo 154" xp 800 (e-start/stock): 549.6
2006 Arctic Cat 153 m-7 : 551.8
2010 Arctic Cat 162 m-8 boondock turbo: 559.0
2008 162" nytro mcx turbo, timbersled front and rear, lightweight seat: 657.4
 

FranktheTank

Active VIP Member
Joined
Dec 26, 2008
Messages
624
Reaction score
1,230
Location
Regina/Bc
Weights from same scale taken pre-season. All sleds ready to ride (full fuel, oils, coolant) :
Snowest Source: The Big Pre-Season Weigh-In - SnoWest Snowmobile Forum

2012 Polaris 155" 600 Pro (electric start): 567.1
2011 Polaris 155" 800 rmk (non-pro): 552.5 (Pro is only 15 lbs less I hear)
2009 Ski-Doo 154" xp 800 (e-start/stock): 549.6
2006 Arctic Cat 153 m-7 : 551.8
2010 Arctic Cat 162 m-8 boondock turbo: 559.0
2008 162" nytro mcx turbo, timbersled front and rear, lightweight seat: 657.4

Umm how is this post relevant you took a bunch of different sleds from 2006-2012 and compared them for what reason?
 

yammyboy

Active VIP Member
Joined
Oct 13, 2011
Messages
316
Reaction score
185
Location
Fort st john
Weights from same scale taken pre-season. All sleds ready to ride (full fuel, oils, coolant) :
Snowest Source: The Big Pre-Season Weigh-In - SnoWest Snowmobile Forum

2012 Polaris 155" 600 Pro (electric start): 567.1
2011 Polaris 155" 800 rmk (non-pro): 552.5 (Pro is only 15 lbs less I hear)
2009 Ski-Doo 154" xp 800 (e-start/stock): 549.6
2006 Arctic Cat 153 m-7 : 551.8
2010 Arctic Cat 162 m-8 boondock turbo: 559.0
2008 162" nytro mcx turbo, timbersled front and rear, lightweight seat: 657.4

From Super trax
No bull everything you need to know
Vol.23 no.1
All 2012 models

Polaris 800 rmk assualt 155" 154hp wet 520 (est) Dry 445
Polaris 800 rush 545 wet (est) Dry 469
Polaris switchback 600 125 hp wet 555 (est) Dry489
Polaris Pro-rmk 155" 800 154 hp wet 510 (est) Dry 438
Polaris rmk 800 155" 154 hp wet 510 (est) Dry 440
Arctic cat M800 hcr 153" 155hp wet 530 (est) Dry 463
Arctic cat M800 sno pro 153" 155 hp wet 535 (est) Dry465
Arctic cat Pro climb turbo M1100 162" 170 hp wet 630 (est) Dry 562
Arctic cat M1100 sno pro 153" 123 hp wet 595 (est) Dry 524
Yamaha nytro 162" 131 hp wet 615 (est) Dry 553
Ski doo summit sp 118 hp 146 "wet 510 (est) Dry 459
Ski doo summit X 163.9 hp dry 454,459,464 lbs (146,154,162)

It say est ( estimate) for all the wet weights and for all the hourse power in the book but these are the weights here you guys go :d
 

Kyle91rs

Active VIP Member
Joined
Oct 6, 2010
Messages
942
Reaction score
1,762
Location
fort mcmurray
What's the site you got that off of?? I'd like to read into that a little more... I don't think it's accurate. Hp numbers are all "estimated" wet weight is "estimated", as for right now, it's all up in the air. I don't think the new cats are heavier then the nytros. I sat on both, new 1100's seem way smaller, no one knows how close these weights are. I think this is just something were gonna have another 3 pages of bickering about. Captain undies already weighed his and it showed 608 on a scale, wet, already turbod, unless something is wrong with his scale or he forgot the gas, I think these "he says she says" numbers are phony.
 

yammyboy

Active VIP Member
Joined
Oct 13, 2011
Messages
316
Reaction score
185
Location
Fort st john
go to the super trax site im reading the magazine right now its Volume 23 number 1 look it up its all in the book it says 2012 no bull buyers guide on the cover and has red polaris rush pro on the cover aswell and they cant have exact wet weight and hourse power could be different from one sled to the exact other one i was just trying to settle things haha
 

geordiep

Active member
Joined
Apr 25, 2007
Messages
131
Reaction score
121
Location
Calgary
Same scale, same time, ready to ride: gives an accurate comparision between sleds. Do I have to spell that out!!

If the 1100T is only 608 wet that is impressive. Dealer stated it is 80 pounds heavier than the 2012 M8 at 635. Either way it is going to be a bad azz sled.
 

jbb

Active VIP Member
Joined
Aug 22, 2008
Messages
20,304
Reaction score
1,717
Location
k town
back in 08 extreme weighed all the new sleds ready to ride. the 153 nytro was 630lbs wet.
 

yammyboy

Active VIP Member
Joined
Oct 13, 2011
Messages
316
Reaction score
185
Location
Fort st john
back in 08 extreme weighed all the new sleds ready to ride. the 153 nytro was 630lbs wet.
The 2008 nytros were heavier and had less power and the tunnel was to deep and it hung up when trenching :d
 

Kruchy

Active member
Joined
Nov 16, 2009
Messages
119
Reaction score
37
Location
Lloydminster
They are estimating horse power and weight? Estimate does not mean actual, it means ESTIMATE. It was "estimated" that I was going to make a million dollars this year, make that two million; I might come up a little short.
 

DILLIGAF

Active member
Joined
Oct 29, 2009
Messages
59
Reaction score
83
Location
Wainwright, alberta
Website
www.adrenalinejunkiesinc.ca
I will as soon as I can but the scale I used was one that is used to way kenworths and stuff to tell if there over weight or not but yeah till then let's just hope for snow :) haha

i weighed my truck and deck on one of those scales, then put my 2012 m8 on the deck and weighed it again. according to the scale, my sled weighs like 462 lbs. 10 litres of fuel and minimal oil in it that came from the factory. almost seems fairly accurate to me.

weight of truck and deck- 1630 kg front, 1880 kg rear axle
weight of truck deck & sled- 1640 kg front, 2090 kg rear axle.
"supposed" weight of sled according to D.O.T. scale= 210 kg
 

hurtinalbertin

Active VIP Member
Joined
Jan 8, 2008
Messages
161
Reaction score
188
Location
Grande Prairie, Alberta
a buddy weighted his '08 nytro in at 630 full of fuel, my '07 M1000 153 at the time was 590, create on new M1100T said 571(dry weight). A can and charge tube change will drop 30lbs. eithier way with boost who cares, I cant wait to ride mine. $15000 + $600 for controller = way cheaper than Nytro and prob just as fun
 

Captain Undies

Active member
Joined
Jan 14, 2009
Messages
142
Reaction score
129
Location
Saskabush!!!
What's the site you got that off of?? I'd like to read into that a little more... I don't think it's accurate. Hp numbers are all "estimated" wet weight is "estimated", as for right now, it's all up in the air. I don't think the new cats are heavier then the nytros. I sat on both, new 1100's seem way smaller, no one knows how close these weights are. I think this is just something were gonna have another 3 pages of bickering about. Captain undies already weighed his and it showed 608 on a scale, wet, already turbod, unless something is wrong with his scale or he forgot the gas, I think these "he says she says" numbers are phony.
LOL I was gonna post a picture of the tank full of gas to,........the new tank doesnt have a big wide opening like the old Mseries though so you cant see right in the tank. I can post a pic of it running with the gauge showing thats its full?
 

yammyboy

Active VIP Member
Joined
Oct 13, 2011
Messages
316
Reaction score
185
Location
Fort st john
What's the site you got that off of?? I'd like to read into that a little more... I don't think it's accurate. Hp numbers are all "estimated" wet weight is "estimated", as for right now, it's all up in the air. I don't think the new cats are heavier then the nytros. I sat on both, new 1100's seem way smaller, no one knows how close these weights are. I think this is just something were gonna have another 3 pages of bickering about. Captain undies already weighed his and it showed 608 on a scale, wet, already turbod, unless something is wrong with his scale or he forgot the gas, I think these "he says she says" numbers are phony.
wet weight is full of gas, oil, anti freeze, snow, all liquids he never had snow on his and snow can make a big difference just saying
 

Kyle91rs

Active VIP Member
Joined
Oct 6, 2010
Messages
942
Reaction score
1,762
Location
fort mcmurray
Yammyboy, I'm just gonna give ya a piece of advice, for one, you're pretty lucky none of the big guys that's been around here a long time hasn't stepped and and really made fun of you... No offense... We've all had to go thru this at one point in time. You seem like a young kid, so take it from my experience and knowledge, please post facts... Theres a lot of ppl reading these forum threads, and that's exactly how rumors get started. If someone read half of your posts, which you've honestly accepted that you were wrong in most of them, they're gonna either believe you and start convincing their buddies the turbo nytros are as light and maneuverable as a saddled up chicken in a head hunting contest. Again, please stick to the real life facts. Were not on here to brag, but to share USEFUL information. Please don't take this post as an insult to you, because that is not how I intended it. All I ask is for everyone reading this thread to give the kid the chance he deserves. Now, as for the sleds, Id like to see as many pics as possible there captain undies! Not saying I don't believe you, but the more proof you show, the less confused this thread will turn out. Right now, it's just a mess of ppl arguing, this and that. By the way, she's a beauty sled buddy, I'm waiting on the exact same thing. If you want some tips that I have inside info on, pm me and I'll send you the ingredients to be king of the mountains! Cheers everyone!
 

yammyboy

Active VIP Member
Joined
Oct 13, 2011
Messages
316
Reaction score
185
Location
Fort st john
yeah in know i messed up a couple of times and i have realized that if its about weight you need a picture to have any one on here believe you thanks tho
 
Top Bottom