136 or 144

Ryeser

Active VIP Member
Joined
Oct 20, 2007
Messages
2,505
Reaction score
946
Location
Parkland County, Alberta (Heart of GBCA)
A couple more pics when we were in progress:
 

Attachments

  • Photo_080608_003.jpg
    Photo_080608_003.jpg
    72.3 KB · Views: 42
  • Photo_080608_007.jpg
    Photo_080608_007.jpg
    66.7 KB · Views: 35
  • Photo_080608_010.jpg
    Photo_080608_010.jpg
    82.9 KB · Views: 44

northstar23

Active VIP Member
Joined
Aug 9, 2008
Messages
264
Reaction score
0
Location
Barrie ON
I got a bought a switchback IQ with a 144 track on it last year and at first I thought it might be like driving a school bus compared to a 121. Now I won't have anything shorter then a 144.
 

BIGFOOT

Moderator
Moderator
Joined
Dec 11, 2006
Messages
5,528
Reaction score
1,079
Location
Hidden zone
I got a bought a switchback IQ with a 144 track on it last year and at first I thought it might be like driving a school bus compared to a 121. Now I won't have anything shorter then a 144.

...Then soon before you know it..... 155 will be the right fit, Or even a 166 ! :):beer:
 

glengine

Active VIP Member
Joined
Jan 1, 2008
Messages
3,724
Reaction score
1,160
Location
Smithers, B.C.
I hope that you are planning on putting a tunnel extension on.. They are cheap and easy t odo. Because from the looks of the set-up right now if you tail plant or land hard on the back of the rear susp you may very well tear up the back end of your sled. As well as the current set-up msy hinder your cooling as alot of snow will probably not hit the cooler as it'll just go straight out the back.. But other than that it's lookin good.. We sell tunnel ext's for like 130.00 JUst my thoughts
 

Ryeser

Active VIP Member
Joined
Oct 20, 2007
Messages
2,505
Reaction score
946
Location
Parkland County, Alberta (Heart of GBCA)
I threw in part of an old mud flap and it is quite angled away. I did it after the pics were taken, I will try that and if it doesn't work then I will add an extension, thanks again for your thoughts!
 

glengine

Active VIP Member
Joined
Jan 1, 2008
Messages
3,724
Reaction score
1,160
Location
Smithers, B.C.
No problem.. Glad to be able to give some advise that might help someoine out.. You sgould post some new pic's of it all done ..
 

papafinger

Active VIP Member
Joined
Sep 14, 2008
Messages
4,511
Reaction score
0
Location
mn
No problem.. Glad to be able to give some advise that might help someoine out.. You sgould post some new pic's of it all done ..

once u run it and r unhappy with the top end u may consider going back to the stock gearing. might be to like at elevation but on the flatlands that 800 should have plenty of power to roll that 136 just fine. My 2 cents that may only be worth a penny:d
 

Rob1334

Active VIP Member
Joined
Sep 4, 2008
Messages
11,287
Reaction score
59
Location
Bismarck, ND
X2 on Papa. 800's have plenty enough power to spin a 136". I would actually try both gears in the same day if you have time, and see which one you like.
 

EJHrider

Active member
Joined
Dec 17, 2007
Messages
26
Reaction score
0
Location
canada
last year i got a 600 switchback with a 144 track and i was wondering if it would be worth taking it to the mountains? I know that it won't be doing any climbing, but i just wanna play around in some POW. Would it be worth putting a more aggressive track (2") on it or am i just wasting my time and money with the 600? :confused:
 

Ryeser

Active VIP Member
Joined
Oct 20, 2007
Messages
2,505
Reaction score
946
Location
Parkland County, Alberta (Heart of GBCA)
My freind has a 2005 switchback with a 600, it kicks my but! He went with a 2 1/4 finger track and now he beats most 800's and gives his brothers 1000 a challenge. I would keep it and get a larger track. Thats just my opinion.
 

EJHrider

Active member
Joined
Dec 17, 2007
Messages
26
Reaction score
0
Location
canada
Thanks man, i think i will. just to be clear though, the 600 has enough power in the deep snow to turn a 2 1/4" inch track? or are major clutch mods needed?
 

twin turbo

Active VIP Member
Joined
Dec 5, 2007
Messages
483
Reaction score
0
Location
edmonton
if i were you i would go at least with the 144, i didnt notice much of a handling or turning difference at all, when i went from 136 to 144 when they came out, even 151 aint bad until you hit the 159 - 163ish.
i had 4 verticlals and rmk's, tuned right they did great back then.
just look at the ditch banging sledsmmost use 144, most versitile :twocents:
 
Top Bottom