2018 Skidoos ... 175" Have peek see

[Mike270412]

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=fVpCqmjZQC8



this is amazing. would not work on the cat or polaris as there is no way they start in 1/3 crank rotation like an etec. they are still 3 pulls on the starter rope those sloppy old engine technologies

What a phuckin troll.

Sent from my SM-G930W8 using Tapatalk

 

[deaner]

I wonder if its just the website, or if you cant get an SP with the 3 inch track anymore? Just tried to build one and 2.5 was the only option.

 

[Bnorth]

I wonder if its just the website, or if you cant get an SP with the 3 inch track anymore? Just tried to build one and 2.5 was the only option.

Did the same thing to me last night

 

[pistoncontracting]

they are still 3 pulls on the starter rope those sloppy old engine technologies

Speaking of sloppy old technology, how bout them saggy old torsion springs??
Or does that add to the whole 'flexy feeling' of the manufactred sloppy suspension??

 

[moyiesledhead]

this is amazing. would not work on the cat or polaris as there is no way they start in 1/3 crank rotation like an etec. they are still 3 pulls on the starter rope those sloppy old engine technologies

I've never pulled on my Cat more than once after the first start of the day.

 

[Cat401]

I've never pulled on my Cat more than once after the first start of the day.

and usually no more than 2 pulls when its cold......some guys have no clue........

 

[deaner]

Did the same thing to me last night

Played with it a bit more and you cant have a pull start. You have to choose the new electric start thing and then the option for a 3 inch track opens up.

 

[teamdirt]

Game Changer!

 

[Bnorth]

Played with it a bit more and you cant have a pull start. You have to choose the new electric start thing and then the option for a 3 inch track opens up.

Oh good so I can't just get the $600 3" option I have to go for a full $1200 add on. I'm not old enough to need e-start yet and would rather have that $600 for fixing other shortcomings of the sled than convenient starting.

 

[deaner]

Oh good so I can't just get the $600 3" option I have to go for a full $1200 add on. I'm not old enough to need e-start yet and would rather have that $600 for fixing other shortcomings of the sled than convenient starting.

100% agree

Im curious if there is any truth to the new 2.5s working as good or better than the 3.0 on the 154? 2.5 is nice in a way because its better for ripping around the acreage. Plus ends up being a whole bunch cheaper now that you have to take the grandpa starting system with the 3.0

 

[Bnorth]

100% agree

Im curious if there is any truth to the new 2.5s working as good or better than the 3.0 on the 154? 2.5 is nice in a way because its better for ripping around the acreage. Plus ends up being a whole bunch cheaper now that you have to take the grandpa starting system with the 3.0

Was talking to Dale at H2O and he doesn't like the new 3" to the point he's putting a t3 track under it. Says his 2016 would kill his 2017

Sent from my SM-G925W8 using Tapatalk

 

[ferniesnow]

Played with it a bit more and you cant have a pull start. You have to choose the new electric start thing and then the option for a 3 inch track opens up.

You can chose the electric start (not the new one) and get a 3" track.

 

[ferniesnow]

Was talking to Dale at H2O and he doesn't like the new 3" to the point he's putting a t3 track under it. Says his 2016 would kill his 2017

Sent from my SM-G925W8 using Tapatalk

I have ridden both with high kms and I'd take the 3" 165 all day over the 3" 174 that's on my T3. I love that track!

 

[maxwell]

100% agree

Im curious if there is any truth to the new 2.5s working as good or better than the 3.0 on the 154? 2.5 is nice in a way because its better for ripping around the acreage. Plus ends up being a whole bunch cheaper now that you have to take the grandpa starting system with the 3.0

there is truth to it depending on the snow conditions. the 850 with the 2.5" track being lighter with taller gearing makes an incredible amount of ground speed compared to its 3" counterpart. so in marginal snow conditions i would take that 2.5" all day long as its spinning it at a very impressive rate of speed which allows you approach certain features with higher speed and maintain higher speed throughout the mauenver pending good traction. However move up to 2+feet of fresh and that 3" will walk right over it. the 2.5" is no slouch in the 850 and by far the better all around machine

 

[Joholio]

:duck!:

 

[takethebounce]

Was talking to Dale at H2O and he doesn't like the new 3" to the point he's putting a t3 track under it. Says his 2016 would kill his 2017

Sent from my SM-G925W8 using Tapatalk

God what does that guy know?

He can't know much he isn't on Snowandmud. Lol




Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

 

[snopro]

God what does that guy know?

He can't know much he isn't on Snowandmud. Lol




Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

What is going on with Dale? I heard he is no longer gonna be a dealer? Is that true?

 

[Cableguy]

rumour has it

 

[bobsledder]

I have ridden both with high kms and I'd take the 3" 165 all day over the 3" 174 that's on my T3. I love that track!

So Fernie, you have had the 174 and now the 165 3 inch For 18 would you go with the 165 or the 175?

 

[bobsledder]

What is going on with Dale? I heard he is no longer gonna be a dealer? Is that true?

Sicamous is getting a new dealer? You moving here Ken?