Xm 1000????

CUSO

Active VIP Member
Joined
Jan 21, 2007
Messages
4,771
Reaction score
5,522
Location
Edmonton
It definitely has the summit a-arms, and the gauge cluster is flat. I think that vent is just a decoy HAHA
Just throwing this out there; It looks pretty narrow in the ski stance......not sure which shocks.......
 

tukernater

Active VIP Member
Joined
Jan 7, 2010
Messages
1,243
Reaction score
1,411
Location
BC
Take both them sleds up to 8000 feet and see how that works out.[/QUOTE In my riding group there is a 872 and a 180 nytro The nitro doesn't keep up at 6500 feet .
 

1100

Active VIP Member
Joined
Sep 7, 2008
Messages
1,198
Reaction score
1,631
Location
sangudo
The nytro is a fat chassis. Has a horrible attack angle and a crap track. The 872 will loose 3 percent per 1000 feet. The turbo four will only loose about 3 percent total
 

DaveB

Active VIP Member
Joined
Sep 18, 2007
Messages
5,884
Reaction score
16,626
Location
Red Deer area
Pictures that go with the black pic from a few pages back...no throttle cable...
 

popcorn popper

Active VIP Member
Joined
Nov 26, 2008
Messages
464
Reaction score
511
Location
central alberta
Ive seen trygstads engine in action and the only place the turbo nytro excels is chute climbing! Other than that its a fatty! I'm very impressed with the little twin I gotta say( I know I bragged the triple way hard) but it flat out works. In the right chassis(ie weight, track, and other goodies) the thing is unstoppable and fun to ride. That been said I don't really have the Cayunas to ride either!! Haha !
 
Last edited:
Top Bottom