2015 Mountain Sleds Dry Weight

06yamahaapex

Active VIP Member
Joined
Sep 10, 2007
Messages
548
Reaction score
901
Location
Stony Plain
I'll chime in here. I had a 2013 M800 Le and have a 2014 xmx and when in deep snow the cat has a fraction of the snow stuck to it compared to the summit. The forward cooler on the cats make a big difference.
 

Bergler

Active member
Joined
Nov 3, 2008
Messages
45
Reaction score
63
Location
Chetwynd
I was just cruising through magazines. Checking the latest about the new sleds. I don't really care, dry weight, full of fluids, full of snow. It just makes me laugh that Arctic Cat does not like to tell there weight when asked. Kinda like the fat girl that is conscious about her weight. Thought it would be good for a giggle.

PS. I would be happy to ride all those sleds. No matter how fat they are. LoL
 

frock

Active VIP Member
Joined
Nov 16, 2008
Messages
526
Reaction score
1,125
Location
Northern BC
It was a good thing I brought my tape measure when I picked up Blacky the other day Bergler. Now I know for sure that the top of the seat on your "Full Mod, Barbie Edition Pro" fits perfectly between the 3 inch lugs on my overweight fatcat..........................................................................just sayin :eek:
 

zeebs

Active VIP Member
Joined
Jul 11, 2010
Messages
14,850
Reaction score
12,000
Location
S.W. Minnesota
It was a good thing I brought my tape measure when I picked up Blacky the other day Bergler. Now I know for sure that the top of the seat on your "Full Mod, Barbie Edition Pro" fits perfectly between the 3 inch lugs on my overweight fatcat..........................................................................just sayin :eek:

Might need that tape measure for the "dick measuring" contest this thread is about to turn into.


Sent using Tapatalk HD
 

sledneck_03

Active VIP Member
Joined
Nov 20, 2008
Messages
2,356
Reaction score
1,571
Location
saskatoon
I wonder if Polaris will still be the lightest once they get 160hp and a mountain track....doubt it

dynotech is dynoing the polaris 800 ho sunday and putting it against the other two 800s.

that 800 ho is lighter than the current 800 in the rmk. so yes, yes it will be the lightest with a 174 3"
 

rightsideup

Active VIP Member
Joined
May 19, 2008
Messages
3,025
Reaction score
2,833
Location
bc
dynotech is dynoing the polaris 800 ho sunday and putting it against the other two 800s.

that 800 ho is lighter than the current 800 in the rmk. so yes, yes it will be the lightest with a 174 3"
I think he thinks it will pick up weight when they go to 17inch wide track
 

24V E30

Active member
Joined
Feb 11, 2014
Messages
93
Reaction score
105
Location
Calgary
Damn, I'm surprised you didn't come back with something along the lines of, ya well atleast my a-arms are not glued or atleast Doo has a 174x3 track hahahaha.
 

sledneck_03

Active VIP Member
Joined
Nov 20, 2008
Messages
2,356
Reaction score
1,571
Location
saskatoon
You ride mountains a lot I can tell

hahah f*ck off. yah guys with their 15" tracks, IDIOTS! cant even get out of the parking lot without sinking! WHAT WERE THEY THINKING, 15" wide tracks?!?!?! that 163" x 2.5" x 15" wide is amazing for lake racing, and trail riding! so smooth! JUST TO THINK adding 1" more width to it would allow you to climb mountains! CRAZY
 

maxwell

Active VIP Member
Joined
Apr 25, 2007
Messages
19,928
Reaction score
42,179
Location
Sherwood Park, Alberta, Canada
hahah f*ck off. yah guys with their 15" tracks, IDIOTS! cant even get out of the parking lot without sinking! WHAT WERE THEY THINKING, 15" wide tracks?!?!?! that 163" x 2.5" x 15" wide is amazing for lake racing, and trail riding! so smooth! JUST TO THINK adding 1" more width to it would allow you to climb mountains! CRAZY

Hey 15" was cool in 1987. But I'm sure you meadow muffins still have fun in the zones you can reach I know I did on my 2001 zx
 

maierch

Active VIP Member
Joined
Oct 26, 2008
Messages
1,565
Reaction score
2,512
Location
Calgary
I think I will.
Was this test an independent test?





For everyone who complains about dry weight, think about it in this perspective:

If you were a snowmobile manufacturer and wanted to stay competitive, would you post ready to ride weights?

Would you include your costing with GST, PDI and freight?

Hell no!! I just isn't appealing.

That doesn't even make sense! Ready to ride weight is something that should be fairly consistent across the board it (Gas, Oil, Coolant- it's all stuff you need to ride). It's all things that the manufacturers can control because of the capacities they have built into their sleds. And it's what they should be reporting because it's the number people want to know.

GST, (You forgot PST for some), PDI and Freight are all things the manufacturers don't control. Two are cash grabs by the government and not consistent for jurisdiction to jurisdiction (State, Provience, County, Etc) and two are cash grabs by the dealers which vary greatly from dealer to dealer.

I'm not sure I follow your analogy here.
 

rightsideup

Active VIP Member
Joined
May 19, 2008
Messages
3,025
Reaction score
2,833
Location
bc
That doesn't even make sense! Ready to ride weight is something that should be fairly consistent across the board it (Gas, Oil, Coolant- it's all stuff you need to ride). It's all things that the manufacturers can control because of the capacities they have built into their sleds. And it's what they should be reporting because it's the number people want to know.

GST, (You forgot PST for some), PDI and Freight are all things the manufacturers don't control. Two are cash grabs by the government and not consistent for jurisdiction to jurisdiction (State, Provience, County, Etc) and two are cash grabs by the dealers which vary greatly from dealer to dealer.

I'm not sure I follow your analogy here.
Ready to ride weight is some thing that the supposedly unbiased snowmobile press provides us the manufactures will provide
what ever stat that is the most flattering.
 

CUSO

Active VIP Member
Joined
Jan 21, 2007
Messages
4,771
Reaction score
5,522
Location
Edmonton
OK What sounds more appealing?

a 460 pound sled, or a 520 pound sled?

You have to remember that very few understand that they even base the sled's weight without shock oil to get their weights. The general public doesn't know this.


And to it being consistent, it isn't. One sled could have x amount of oil, gas, coolant capacities, the other have y amount, and the other z. These numbers could be a difference of 10 pounds or more.

If you don't understand what I am saying, you need to study more in marketing.




That doesn't even make sense! Ready to ride weight is something that should be fairly consistent across the board it (Gas, Oil, Coolant- it's all stuff you need to ride). It's all things that the manufacturers can control because of the capacities they have built into their sleds. And it's what they should be reporting because it's the number people want to know.

GST, (You forgot PST for some), PDI and Freight are all things the manufacturers don't control. Two are cash grabs by the government and not consistent for jurisdiction to jurisdiction (State, Provience, County, Etc) and two are cash grabs by the dealers which vary greatly from dealer to dealer.

I'm not sure I follow your analogy here.
 

Staple_STI

Active VIP Member
Joined
Sep 4, 2012
Messages
439
Reaction score
450
Location
Calgary
hahah f*ck off. yah guys with their 15" tracks, IDIOTS! cant even get out of the parking lot without sinking! WHAT WERE THEY THINKING, 15" wide tracks?!?!?! that 163" x 2.5" x 15" wide is amazing for lake racing, and trail riding! so smooth! JUST TO THINK adding 1" more width to it would allow you to climb mountains! CRAZY

Do like everyone else does, ignore the high school drop out.. he is like a high school girl on a transit system looking for attention, believing that being annoying is the way.
 
Top Bottom