Chrisco
Active VIP Member
That's the problem. Theory. Wish someone could find a way to test it
Soon.
That's the problem. Theory. Wish someone could find a way to test it
Good for him LHF!!!trying to out do your wedge is he!!
If it created all that pressure, water would be coming out of the tunnel, or at least snow compressed to ice.
GIVER at full speed, Let off the throttle, and jam the brakes. Flip sled on the side and see if you can stick your hand up there.
My theory is that if you have less clearance, you have more ecfficiency (less snow to stick to tunnel, less weight, less air to move) Look at a vacuum when it gets less air, the rpm increases.
If it created all that pressure, water would be coming out of the tunnel, or at least snow compressed to ice.
GIVER at full speed, Let off the throttle, and jam the brakes. Flip sled on the side and see if you can stick your hand up there.
My theory is that if you have less clearance, you have more ecfficiency (less snow to stick to tunnel, less weight, less air to move) Look at a vacuum when it gets less air, the rpm increases.
Don't to modify the belt drive (chain case) to run 7 tooth 3" pitch drivers either. Avid has drivers with the extroverts offset to the outside...
View attachment 139763
So, how well does the 162 X 3 work on the Pro with 7 tooth drivers and chaincase mod vs doing the Avid chaincase. Only reason I ask is I have a buddy who is a great welder and can easily mod my stock chaincase vs the +$1000 for the Avid chaincase.
Done fishing. Let's go sledding !!
There are a bunch of sleds doing this mod for this year, especially now that the new 15" wide track is available, but i doubt any have hit the snow yet.