Sharia Law petition e-909

FernieHawk

Active VIP Member
Joined
Dec 1, 2008
Messages
1,965
Reaction score
5,563
Location
Fernie, BC
I just signed this petition...how about you?

https://petitions.parl.gc.ca/en/Petition/Details?Petition=e-909


Petition to the Government of Canada
Whereas:

Differential justice based on an individual’s religion is prejudicial and preferential, therefore, an amendment to the Constitution Act of 1982 would ease the minds of all Canadians and ensure equal treatment for everyone under the Criminal Code of Canada.

We, the undersigned, citizens of Canada, call upon the Government of Canada to propose an amendment to the Constitution Act of 1982, under the Canadian Charter of Rights and Freedoms, stating that Sharia Law or separate Sharia family courts will never have a place in the Canadian Justice System.
 

Cdnfireman

Active VIP Member
Joined
Sep 11, 2012
Messages
2,726
Reaction score
9,527
Location
Alberta
Signed as well. Unfortunately the precedent has already been set with the establishment of the aboriginal court system. Also, the isolated immigrant communities that want sharia courts will set them up anyway as they have done in Great Britain with the over 800 sharia courts that exist there.
 

Merc63

Active VIP Member
Joined
Aug 24, 2014
Messages
1,843
Reaction score
2,904
Location
Alberta
You can sign all you want, but the reality of the situation is, Muslims are out breeding traditional Canadian, American and European families. It's only a mater of time with our 1.6 births per female before we go the way of the Natives.

Better start teaching your kids Arabic. It's impossible to sustain a culture on 1.6 births/female.
 

snowcannon

Active VIP Member
Joined
Oct 29, 2015
Messages
421
Reaction score
737
Location
Salmon Arm
You can sign all you want, but the reality of the situation is, Muslims are out breeding traditional Canadian, American and European families. It's only a mater of time with our 1.6 births per female before we go the way of the Natives.

Better start teaching your kids Arabic. It's impossible to sustain a culture on 1.6 births/female.

Bang on!!!
 

DRD

Active VIP Member
Joined
Oct 21, 2008
Messages
2,728
Reaction score
5,388
Location
Red Deer County
Phase one passed, further discussion on this matter can and will be punished to the full extent of the law....
 

whoDEANie

Active VIP Member
Joined
Feb 8, 2009
Messages
4,633
Reaction score
8,479
Location
Edmonton
Infuriating! Issues revolving around racism are real and a little frightening at times but I would never have thought a bill, particularly one worded like this would have made it through parliament. ...was actually counting on a non-confidence vote.

By including the term "Islamophobia," have they effectively made illegal for us to legitimately express fear when it pertains even remotely to Islam?
 

drew562

Active VIP Member
Joined
Mar 13, 2008
Messages
4,886
Reaction score
18,864
Location
edmonton
All members of the KKK didn't hang people. They were very religious and all KKK members were deemed dangerous criminals. All terror attacks are done in the name of Islam and all Muslims should be put on notice and considered dangerous in western countries. . Islam is a bull**** political movement.
 

catalac

Active VIP Member
Joined
Nov 22, 2008
Messages
3,371
Reaction score
12,508
Location
Red Deer
You can sign all you want, but the reality of the situation is, Muslims are out breeding traditional Canadian, American and European families. It's only a mater of time with our 1.6 births per female before we go the way of the Natives.

Better start teaching your kids Arabic. It's impossible to sustain a culture on 1.6 births/female.

yup no doubt there, caught my attention couple weeks ago when CBC had a heart warming story of a refugee family coming in from Syria with 7 kids, in one generation that family from current parents down could grow from 9 individuals to 51 if the 7 kids have 7 kids each, vs my family of 4 growing to 8 from each having 2 kids. Take that out 3 generations and it becomes approx 350 vs 16.
 

DaveB

Active VIP Member
Joined
Sep 18, 2007
Messages
5,884
Reaction score
16,626
Location
Red Deer area
By including the term "Islamophobia," have they effectively made illegal for us to legitimately express fear when it pertains even remotely to Islam?
Not yet. It is "just a motion" so now they can study it and they've decided that it is a "real concern". The law will come next.
 

whoDEANie

Active VIP Member
Joined
Feb 8, 2009
Messages
4,633
Reaction score
8,479
Location
Edmonton
Not yet. It is "just a motion" so now they can study it and they've decided that it is a "real concern". The law will come next.

Lol, of course. ...was before first coffe and had a bit of a brain fart.
 

pipes

Active VIP Member
Joined
Dec 23, 2008
Messages
25,972
Reaction score
36,454
Location
Bonnyville Alberta
Liberals rejected an attempt by Saskatchewan Conservative MP David Anderson to remove the word "Islamophobia​" from the motion and change the wording to "condemn all forms of systemic racism, religious intolerance and discrimination of Muslims, Jews Christians, Sikhs, Hindus and other religious communities.
Anderson argued Islamophobia was not defined in the motion, and that its inclusion contributed to widespread confusion and fears about the impact on freedom of speech. ​
M-103 generated controversy on social media and through online petitions, with some incorrectly suggesting it is a "law" or a "bill" rather than a non-binding motion. Some have raised concerns it would lead to some form of Sharia law in Canada.

Kahlid's motion passes yet Anderson's motion is shot down.
 
Top Bottom