Pro rmk track upgrade

sledneck_03

Active VIP Member
Joined
Nov 20, 2008
Messages
2,356
Reaction score
1,571
Location
saskatoon
Part #
DescriptionWL_Lug Ht.WeightWindowsPitchNotes
9104 Challenger Extreme 151552.557 full
2.86​
Now in 2.86" Pitch for Polaris and Ski-Doo - Center Port for Polaris center drive
 

Canuk

Active VIP Member
Joined
Nov 13, 2008
Messages
440
Reaction score
139
Location
Edmonton
what kind of difference will one notice if they upgrade from a 155 stock to a 155 CE (2.5") track?
 

prairie rmk

Active member
Joined
Dec 19, 2010
Messages
35
Reaction score
10
Location
Humboldt, SK
Doesn't sound like too many guys ran the Camoplast Peak 2.5 this year. Wonder how it would compare to the CE?
 

0neoldfart

Active VIP Member
Joined
Nov 22, 2008
Messages
1,384
Reaction score
2,630
Location
Thorsby
Doesn't sound like too many guys ran the Camoplast Peak 2.5 this year. Wonder how it would compare to the CE?
There is a guy in our group with the camoplast peak 2.5 on a 2012 Pro RMK 800. the track hooks up very well from what I've seen, but it has way more lug damage (tearing) - then the CE 2.5's. Throws snow like an attack 20 in HC position on the trail, too. I think it may be a slightly better powder track then the CE 2.5, but longevity may be an issue...
 

06 Dragon

Active VIP Member
Joined
Nov 17, 2006
Messages
2,051
Reaction score
3,505
Location
Red Deer County
I am looking to upgrade as well. How does a 174" x 2.5". compare to the 3" x 162? Cost comparison as well? This would be installed on a 2012 Pro Turbo.
I believe that you can get away with out a drop and roll by using a 174" X 2.5" but you would have to incorporate the cost of new rails,and tunnel extension, already have a bakers set up on the 163".
 
Top Bottom