GM 1500's

pfi572

Active VIP Member
Joined
Mar 10, 2010
Messages
6,064
Reaction score
15,262
Location
Grande Prairie
It says nothing about running premium in owners manual?
I do but sure isn't required.
 

loudmouth+coke

Active member
Joined
Oct 21, 2008
Messages
45
Reaction score
137
Location
Sherwood Park
I have a 2014 GMC Denali 6.2L with the 8 seed tranny
Open the fuel door and check out the sticker.

From what I understand, the 2015 have the 8 speed tranny optional for the 6.2L and the 2016s have it optional for both the 5.3 and 6.2
 

Attachments

  • image1.jpg
    image1.jpg
    53.3 KB · Views: 230

Cat401

Active VIP Member
Joined
Dec 27, 2008
Messages
3,115
Reaction score
8,290
Location
Waskatenau, Alberta
I have a 2014 GMC Denali 6.2L with the 8 seed tranny
Open the fuel door and check out the sticker.

From what I understand, the 2015 have the 8 speed tranny optional for the 6.2L and the 2016s have it optional for both the 5.3 and 6.2

i thought the 8 spd didn't come out till 2015? Even early 15's have the 6 spd...so i was told..... am i wrong?
 

pfi572

Active VIP Member
Joined
Mar 10, 2010
Messages
6,064
Reaction score
15,262
Location
Grande Prairie
Recommend, not required .
Also mine is a 2014 with 6 speed trans.
Was going to go with 2015 but price increased with the 8 speed and different electronic controlled shocks.
 
Last edited:

rsaruk

Active VIP Member
Joined
Jul 28, 2009
Messages
357
Reaction score
520
Location
Stony Plain
I have a 2014 GMC Denali 6.2L with the 8 seed tranny
Open the fuel door and check out the sticker.

From what I understand, the 2015 have the 8 speed tranny optional for the 6.2L and the 2016s have it optional for both the 5.3 and 6.2
Is this just the 6.2? I better check the fuel door on my 2014 5.3. Never noticed this before.

Sent from my SM-G920W8 using Tapatalk
 

bingo1010

Active VIP Member
Joined
Jan 21, 2013
Messages
440
Reaction score
507
Location
elk point, alberta
Recommend, not required .
Also mine is a 2014 with 6 speed trans.
Was going to go with 2015 but price increased with the 8 speed and different electronic controlled shocks.

not sure about the chevy stuff, but the ford ecoboost gets noticably better economy with premium, cant really say anything about better power but the econmy increase pays for the extra cost of the premium. trouble with all the new computer controlled vehicles is you cant tell if they are taking timing out and detuning the engine due to lower octane fuel
 

MK4TDI

Active VIP Member
Joined
Dec 5, 2010
Messages
3,874
Reaction score
16,113
Location
Saskatchatoon
Recommended yes, I believe the same sticker/warning is on the fuel cap of an Etec too?

Everything I have read up on that 6.2 states with the 11.5:1 compression ratio the factory tune is built on 91/93 octane fuel. Yes it can compensate for a lower quality fuel much like the Etec, which in a pinch can get you were you need to go. But I wouldn't get in a regular habit of using regular in my sled, nor would I with that 6.2. Thats just my $.02 which led me to the 5.3 instead, which has a Blackbear tune for premium anyways...haha

As far as engines and transmission packages go. To my knowledge the 8spd wasn't available in 2014, with his being a Denali, it very well could be as they seem to always get special treatment vs most other trucks. I didn't investigate the Denali at all really cause I knew that wasn't a truck I would be buying. So for the regular Silverado's it goes: 2014 5.3 and 6.2 both got the 6spd, in 2015 the 5.3 still has the 6spd and any model with the 6.2 had the option for an 8sp, 6spd was standard. For the 2016's the upper end models with the 5.3 (SLT, LTZ, High Country, Denali) come with the 6spd standard still with the option for the 8spd. Any model with the 6.2 has the option again, the 6.2 High Country and Denali come standard with the 8spd.
 

Cat401

Active VIP Member
Joined
Dec 27, 2008
Messages
3,115
Reaction score
8,290
Location
Waskatenau, Alberta
Recommended yes, I believe the same sticker/warning is on the fuel cap of an Etec too?

Everything I have read up on that 6.2 states with the 11.5:1 compression ratio the factory tune is built on 91/93 octane fuel. Yes it can compensate for a lower quality fuel much like the Etec, which in a pinch can get you were you need to go. But I wouldn't get in a regular habit of using regular in my sled, nor would I with that 6.2. Thats just my $.02 which led me to the 5.3 instead, which has a Blackbear tune for premium anyways...haha

As far as engines and transmission packages go. To my knowledge the 8spd wasn't available in 2014, with his being a Denali, it very well could be as they seem to always get special treatment vs most other trucks. I didn't investigate the Denali at all really cause I knew that wasn't a truck I would be buying. So for the regular Silverado's it goes: 2014 5.3 and 6.2 both got the 6spd, in 2015 the 5.3 still has the 6spd and any model with the 6.2 had the option for an 8sp, 6spd was standard. For the 2016's the upper end models with the 5.3 (SLT, LTZ, High Country, Denali) come with the 6spd standard still with the option for the 8spd. Any model with the 6.2 has the option again, the 6.2 High Country and Denali come standard with the 8spd.

I think you are bang on 100% right in terms of transmission availability

In terms of premium fuel.....I tend to disagree with the "need to burn Premium" crowd.

I have a 2011 6.2L with 276,000 kms......I have tried premium a few times and didn't feel/see any difference over regular in regard to performance or fuel economy. I changed the plugs and wires at about 250,000km and the old plugs were like new....

I run Petro Canada regular pretty much all the time. Is there something I am missing to the premium argument?
 

bingo1010

Active VIP Member
Joined
Jan 21, 2013
Messages
440
Reaction score
507
Location
elk point, alberta
I run Petro Canada regular pretty much all the time. Is there something I am missing to the premium argument?

i used to doubt my brother with his ecoboost, until i bought one, i ran regular for the first8000 - 10000 km, then started using premium and noticed a jump in mileage, have since switched back and forth several times and always notice an increase in mileage. on average i would say a decrease of about 2L/100 km

not saying the chevs are the same, but i know it does affect the ecoboost, chances are if they recomend it then the engine will run better with it.......just saying
 

pfi572

Active VIP Member
Joined
Mar 10, 2010
Messages
6,064
Reaction score
15,262
Location
Grande Prairie
Boost is way different .
It will improve with boost but not much if any on natural aspirated engine.
I run premium as my truck does seem to run better with it.
Advances timing and things I would guess.
 

tex78

Active VIP Member
Joined
Feb 5, 2010
Messages
17,526
Reaction score
16,895
Location
DA Moose B.C
Yes a boost will like premium fuel, with knock sensors going off less, more power comes
 

greenlightning86

Active member
Joined
Apr 8, 2008
Messages
51
Reaction score
22
Location
AB
I think you are bang on 100% right in terms of transmission availability

In terms of premium fuel.....I tend to disagree with the "need to burn Premium" crowd.

I have a 2011 6.2L with 276,000 kms......I have tried premium a few times and didn't feel/see any difference over regular in regard to performance or fuel economy. I changed the plugs and wires at about 250,000km and the old plugs were like new....

I run Petro Canada regular pretty much all the time. Is there something I am missing to the premium argument?

If you are only driving down the highway I agree with you, there is no difference between running premium or regular. It feels the same and gets the same mileage. With my truck it is very noticeable when sitting at red lights and accelerating. At a red light on regular the rpm's jump around and the idle is noticeably rough but on premium the rpm is consistent. I have also noticed a slight difference on hard acceleration, the truck just feels a little sluggish on regular.

But like I said gas mileage is pretty much identical between the two, even when pulling a load.
 

RoyalCargo

Member
Joined
Nov 29, 2008
Messages
10
Reaction score
6
Location
Edmonton
I drive from the SS of Edmonton to Nisku everyday also. I bought a 2015 GMC with the 6.2 and an 8 speed, best truck I have ever owned, so far.
I run regular fuel and I'm consistently 11.9 L/100 on Hwy. Towing is another story lol. Buy it, you wont regret it !
 

scrfce

Active VIP Member
Joined
Oct 18, 2008
Messages
1,947
Reaction score
1,413
Location
spruce grove
If i had the chance again id do 6.2 no questions. The 5.3 is good and all but after driving my buds 6.2's i wish i wouldve been a bit more patient and waited for one.

Needed my pickup asap tho and there were no 6.2s readily available at the time
 

thump

Active VIP Member
Joined
Nov 2, 2007
Messages
327
Reaction score
335
Location
Earth
I had a 2012 Denali 6.2 ,6 speed(130000km) and have a 2015 Denali 6.2, 8 speed with 7200km, not sold on the 8 speed just yet, needs different programming, shifting is weird at times. 8 speed will certainly be better for pulling loads. The 2015 doesnt seem to have the zip my 2012 had, maybe just needs more kms. Love them both! As for fuel I run regular most of the time, no problems yet.
 
Last edited:

j335

Active VIP Member
Joined
Jan 3, 2007
Messages
1,870
Reaction score
1,815
Location
AB
I had a 2012 Denali 6.2 ,6 speed(130000km) and have a 2015 Denali 6.2, 8 speed with 7200km, not sold on the 8 speed just yet, needs different programming, shifting is weird at times. 8 speed will certainly be better for pulling loads. The 2015 doesnt seem to have the zip my 2012 had, maybe just needs more kms. Love them both! As for fuel I run regular most of the time, no problems yet.

How does the mileage compare between the two?
 

BEL

Active VIP Member
Joined
Mar 3, 2015
Messages
752
Reaction score
861
Location
Alberta
Have had four 5.3, all in 1500's, and two 6.2, both in 2500's. Obviously the 6.2 is better for towing but the mileage when not is comparable to the 5.3, and in one particular truck (2012) was actually better. The 5.3 has a harder time with any amount of load and I sure wouldn't want to be pulling anything in the mountains with one. Have always used regular in them without any issues, and for oil changes always go by the computer - I use Mobil 1 full synthetic and usually get about 15,000 k between changes, and even then the colour is still good, and although we usually only keep them 3 years had 330k on one and it never used a drop of oil between changes. Currently have a 2014 1500 with a 5.3 and a 2015 2500 with the 6.2 - both are 6 speeds. Either way you should be fine, but if it's for towing definitely go with the 6.2.
 
Last edited:

Cat401

Active VIP Member
Joined
Dec 27, 2008
Messages
3,115
Reaction score
8,290
Location
Waskatenau, Alberta
Have had four 5.3, all in 1500's, and two 6.2, both in 2500's. Obviously the 6.2 is better for towing but the mileage when not is comparable to the 5.3, and in one particular truck (2012) was actually better. The 5.3 has a harder time with any amount of load and I sure wouldn't want to be pulling anything in the mountains with one. Have always used regular in them without any issues, and for oil changes always go by the computer - I use Mobil 1 full synthetic and usually get about 15,000 k between changes, and even then the colour is still good, and although we usually only keep them 3 years had 330k on one and it never used a drop of oil between changes. Currently have a 2014 1500 with a 5.3 and a 2015 2500 with the 6.2 - both are 6 speeds. Either way you should be fine, but if it's for towing definitely go with the 6.2.


Don't believe the 6.2 was ever in the 2500.....only available as an option in the 1500's..........perhaps you are thinking the 6.0L?
 

kovs

Active VIP Member
Joined
Apr 12, 2009
Messages
802
Reaction score
1,048
Location
Rosetown, sask
Definately no 6.2L in the 2500 or I would own one
For 15 and up soon as you go to 6.2L you get the 8sp


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
 
Top Bottom