2015 ski-doo lineup preview.........

mxz800x

Active VIP Member
Joined
Sep 10, 2009
Messages
507
Reaction score
509
Location
prince albert sask
brp or camoplast will have to build a new flex edge 172 x16x3. therefore the pitch should be the same as a 163,that way people who want to upgrade to the 172 flex edge on the t motion can without changing their drivers. just a thought
 

summitstef

Active member
Joined
Jan 5, 2007
Messages
146
Reaction score
137
Location
Down an ole dirt road in a town you wouldn't know
brp or camoplast will have to build a new flex edge 172 x16x3. therefore the pitch should be the same as a 163,that way people who want to upgrade to the 172 flex edge on the t motion can without changing their drivers. just a thought

And a good thought at that, however BRP does a stellar job of always finding new ways to extract more $$ from the consumer, the pitch will change so we will all have to by new drivers along with the 172" track on previous model year sleds...
 

ferniesnow

I'm doo-ing it!
Joined
Dec 2, 2008
Messages
108,947
Reaction score
83,267
Location
beautiful, downtown Salmon Arm, BC
Current 174s are all a 3" pitch track. 2.86s will fit but not exact.

Calculate a quick % of change between 146-154 & 154-163 and youll find the same step up from a 163 is a 172

You are the man with the numbers! I was just repeating what I was told from a reliable source. You know, all I doo is ride 'em! Numbers aren't my forte!
 

aircanam

Active VIP Member
Joined
Sep 11, 2007
Messages
266
Reaction score
286
Location
Sturgeon County
If i'm not mistaken I think going from a 154 to 163 puts an additional 4in of track on snow. So going to 172 would do the same?
 

summit1974

Active VIP Member
Joined
Dec 6, 2010
Messages
919
Reaction score
672
Location
by the tracks
Do that many people really want a 174 land yacht? LMAO

personally i would stick with 163….But i think a lot of guys would go with the 172 if they come out with one…I got to take a TSS turbo for a quick ripp and thats what i am gonna start saving for!!!
 

lilduke

Active VIP Member
Joined
Sep 15, 2009
Messages
17,565
Reaction score
62,483
Location
Local
personally i would stick with 163….But i think a lot of guys would go with the 172 if they come out with one…I got to take a TSS turbo for a quick ripp and thats what i am gonna start saving for!!!

Probably,, I think most of them would regret it though and wind up going back to a 163 on their next sled. Who knows, guess we'll see.
 

maxwell

Active VIP Member
Joined
Apr 25, 2007
Messages
19,916
Reaction score
42,112
Location
Sherwood Park, Alberta, Canada
I can't see anyone that rides steep and deep regretting a 174. If jumps and general free riding are your thing then ya might not be the best choice


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk -
 

lilduke

Active VIP Member
Joined
Sep 15, 2009
Messages
17,565
Reaction score
62,483
Location
Local
I can't see anyone that rides steep and deep regretting a 174. If jumps and general free riding are your thing then ya might not be the best choice


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk -
Yea I ride steep and deep every day but what do I know...lol
 

maxwell

Active VIP Member
Joined
Apr 25, 2007
Messages
19,916
Reaction score
42,112
Location
Sherwood Park, Alberta, Canada
Yea I ride steep and deep every day but what do I know...lol

I realize that you do. And I'm glad you like your 154 they are sick sleds. But the amount of people adding 174 tracks an 3" to previous model year sleds tells me it's in demand. I said I would never ride a 163 either but here I am. So we'll see. I think it will be a hit if released


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk -
 

lilduke

Active VIP Member
Joined
Sep 15, 2009
Messages
17,565
Reaction score
62,483
Location
Local
I realize that you do. And I'm glad you like your 154 they are sick sleds. But the amount of people adding 174 tracks an 3" to previous model year sleds tells me it's in demand. I said I would never ride a 163 either but here I am. So we'll see. I think it will be a hit if released


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk -
Oh most likely will be a hit, Im sure Ill still be pulling on their skis on the real deep days tho....lol
 

revbyu

Active VIP Member
Joined
Nov 24, 2008
Messages
864
Reaction score
1,409
Location
Calgary
For me 163 goes pretty much every where i wanna go ! 174 X 3 for those days of chest powder ---- maybe ! Not sure theres enough hp to turn that footprint from a 800 etec ! if it comes in the 900/1200 powerplant then u gotta deal with the extra weight ???
 

snopro

Active VIP Member
Joined
Mar 3, 2009
Messages
102,159
Reaction score
91,448
Location
Milo,Alberta
For me 163 goes pretty much every where i wanna go ! 174 X 3 for those days of chest powder ---- maybe ! Not sure theres enough hp to turn that footprint from a 800 etec ! if it comes in the 900/1200 powerplant then u gotta deal with the extra weight ???
There is enough motor for that track. Guys are building them everyday. There is surprisingly alot of them out there.
 

revbyu

Active VIP Member
Joined
Nov 24, 2008
Messages
864
Reaction score
1,409
Location
Calgary
I know they are building them - but do they come out of shop with stock hp ??? ones I've seen havent ??
 
Top Bottom