canuck5
Active VIP Member
What does a fully fueled full of coolant 850 weigh? Anyone
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
What does a fully fueled full of coolant 850 weigh? Anyone
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
Especially if you go turbo to turbo.Drop the price down to equal or less than a 2S and I almost guarantee you would see a shift in sales.
To me it's more of a case of power to weight and cost that affects the sales of the 4S. I feel now that 4S p to w is better than the 2S, and price is getting closer seeing as the 850 pushes 17g, your going to see a shift.
Do you think it's possible?
Many have thought that a turbo 4-stroke has been a revolutionary idea in snowmobile technology, from the RX-1, Apex, Nytro, and Viper platforms with aftermarket turbos to the arctic cat 1100 turbo and the new turbo Sidewinder. Yet Ski-Doo, Arctic Cat and Polaris all keep going strong with 800 and now 850 2-strokes. The fact of the matter is you can't put lipstick on a pig or in this case a turbo on a fat 4-stroke and make it a winner.
The weight is ultimately what keeps people from buying these machines, and until you can make a 4-stroke weigh under 450lbs 2-strokes will dominate.
Get a grip. A stock trim 163 2S doesn't even weigh that little. Try 550lbs. And that's an achievable weight for a 4S with a turbo IMO.
Ski-doo has the 900 ACE weighs 22 lbs more than the 850, which is in the ballpark in my mind. Turbo is close to net zero lbs by the time you pull the suitcase off.Without fuel yeah they do. If you really think you can make a fat pig of a 4 stroke lighter or as light as a 2-stroke then go ahead and keep believing that.
It's funny that Rotax builds numerous types of 4 stroke engines for sea-doos, aircraft, SxS's Etc. and Ski-Doo has access to all of this technology, yet their newest and greatest in the mountain market is an 850cc 2-stroke. I wonder why this is?
Um no they don't. I don't know why people even compare weights unless they are full of fluids. Seriously. Who rides without fluids?Without fuel yeah they do. If you really think you can make a fat pig of a 4 stroke lighter or as light as a 2-stroke then go ahead and keep believing that.
It's funny that Rotax builds numerous types of 4 stroke engines for sea-doos, aircraft, SxS's Etc. and Ski-Doo has access to all of this technology, yet their newest and greatest in the mountain market is an 850cc 2-stroke. I wonder why this is?
Without fuel yeah they do. If you really think you can make a fat pig of a 4 stroke lighter or as light as a 2-stroke then go ahead and keep believing that.
It's funny that Rotax builds numerous types of 4 stroke engines for sea-doos, aircraft, SxS's Etc. and Ski-Doo has access to all of this technology, yet their newest and greatest in the mountain market is an 850cc 2-stroke. I wonder why this is?
OK good, I was starting to think I was the only one noticing that the gap has narrowed seriously.Um no they don't. I don't know why people even compare weights unless they are full of fluids. Seriously. Who rides without fluids?
RTR weights.
//uploads.tapatalk-cdn.com/20161226/e160c57683b34e60c8281bd520aaffab.jpg
//uploads.tapatalk-cdn.com/20161226/b319e99ff31358c52f2cd8b6e5537083.jpg
//uploads.tapatalk-cdn.com/20161226/945040e8d3efa7fc2b0d7baac6b3817e.jpg
The gap ain't that big between them. HP however has a gap and it doesn't favor the 2S.
A first generation Rev chassis weighs close to the same as an SW. Don't remember anyone calling them fat back then.
Um no they don't. I don't know why people even compare weights unless they are full of fluids. Seriously. Who rides without fluids?
RTR weights.
//uploads.tapatalk-cdn.com/20161226/e160c57683b34e60c8281bd520aaffab.jpg
//uploads.tapatalk-cdn.com/20161226/b319e99ff31358c52f2cd8b6e5537083.jpg
//uploads.tapatalk-cdn.com/20161226/945040e8d3efa7fc2b0d7baac6b3817e.jpg
The gap ain't that big between them. HP however has a gap and it doesn't favor the 2S.
A first generation Rev chassis weighs close to the same as an SW. Don't remember anyone calling them fat back then.
Haha yup.The last pic. of the Summit at 590lbs is only 30lbs lighter then my 620lbs pig. Except i have nearly a 100HP advantage on it at seas level and a heck of alot more at 6,000ft.
A 174 summit xm is 547 wet. They gained 40lbs this year?? I don't think so. I think that picture is bogus? probably had 2 jerry cans on the back...lol
G4 feels lighter to unstuck then a XM to me.
http://www.snowmobile.com/gallery/gallery.php/d/43551-3/2015-Ski-Doo-Summit-Weight.jpg
Could be, couldn't find any other picture on the net of them hanging on the scale.
I do know that particular 850 is e start.
But so is the winder.
Yeah I am sure this will spur on a response from someone who has one they can weigh.Yeah it's on the internet and half the sled is cropped out of the pic...
If had to guess Id say its about 40lbs high. But who knows? Give it some time and more people will throw one on a scale.
Feels really light when you ride one, or have to unstuck one.