You never know I know it is important for the 2016 models to be not ridden due to safety issue's but that sucks for the people the laid out that coin. As far as something else going on could it be litigation??Something seems a little fishy. These two problems don't seem like they'd be very difficult to release a fix for - reflash the ECU and add a hose clamp. There must be something else going on that Polaris doesn't want to admit.
You never know I know it is important for the 2016 models to be not ridden due to safety issue's but that sucks for the people the laid out that coin. As far as something else going on could it be litigation??
You never know I know it is important for the 2016 models to be not ridden due to safety issue's but that sucks for the people the laid out that coin. As far as something else going on could it be litigation??
I did not catch the part about bring it in for a recall and you could ride your 2016Then again, I guess it wouldn't take very long for that kind of info to leak out.
I was thinking more along the lines of a more serious defect that they could be embarrassed about. ...admit to the minor defect and secretly fix the major one when you bring it in for the recall.
What a terrible time for this to happen to the popo flagship turbo model. Just as canam unveil the mighty X3 game changer.....
Hmmmm , luck ....I think not! Big $$ at stake here.....!
yeah...possible I sure if the dealers know about legal stuff they cannot pass that on I was told more hpYeah, I'm expecting it'll be the same as what they did the new Ace 900 with a longer, wider chassis for more room for the plumbing and heat control, and not to mention just plain more control.
Still, it's not like Polaris to completely drop a flagship like that from their website as if it doesn't exist. Somethings going on in lawyer land. Hell, the 900 Fusion lasted two seasons... jus' sayin.