More bad oil news: New well cleanup rules could put damper on Canadian energy deals

Summitric

SUPER COOL MOD & Supporting Vendor
Moderator
Joined
Oct 21, 2006
Messages
48,007
Reaction score
32,148
Location
Edmonton/Sherwood Park
Website
www.bumpertobumper.ca
© Supplied 022216-fpbz0228-gmo-juniors-well-W.jpg A sudden regulatory shift threatens to curb Canadian energy asset deals, just as producers and creditors look to unload properties two years into a crude market downturn.
The Alberta Energy Regulator made a surprise rule change Monday evening, requiring a more stringent solvency test for buyers of oil and natural gas assets. While the move is meant to ensure purchasers can cover well cleanup costs, some dealmakers say it will also hinder transactions.
“It’s going to create dampened activity on asset dispositions,” said Sonny Mottahed, managing partner and chief executive officer of Calgary-based Black Spruce Merchant Capital Corp. “People are caught off guard and they’re very surprised.”
The rule change — meant to be an interim measure — is in response to an Alberta court decision last month. That ruling, which the regulator is appealing, let the receiver of bankrupt oil company Redwater Energy Corp. walk away from some assets it deemed unprofitable, plus the related clean-up responsibilities.
The case triggered a broader discussion over how environmental liabilities should rank among debts of an insolvent producer, as more default on their loans with U.S. crude still about 50 percent below its mid-2014 peak.
“We recognize that it’s going to inconvenience some stakeholders but they’re interim measures and we want to ensure the continued protection of Albertans and also confidence in the regulatory system,” Ryan Bartlett, a spokesman for the Alberta Energy Regulator, said in a phone interview. “We are working with the government of Alberta on a way to come up with a long-term regulatory solution to these issues.”
The main change from the regulator is the doubling of the liability management ratio for asset buyers. The rating is a reflection of the extent to which a company’s assets cover its liabilities related to well cleanup. Purchasers are now required to have ratings of 2.0 or higher, up from a minimum of 1.0 previously. About 72 per cent of 788 licensees evaluated have ratios below the 2.0 threshold, according to the regulator’s online list.
Among those with a mandate to buy assets with ratios below 2.0 are Pine Cliff Energy Ltd., Northern Blizzard Resources Inc. and Spartan Energy Corp., Ryan Mooney, a director and energy specialist on Dundee Capital Markets’ sales team in Calgary, wrote Tuesday in a note.
Phil Hodge, chief executive officer of Calgary-based Pine Cliff, agreed in a phone interview that the company, which has been acquiring assets for more than four years, may be impeded under the new rule. More concerning though is the potential broader impact on the industry, Hodge said. With low oil prices, the company is more focused on improving its balance sheet than making purchases, he said.
Chief executives of Spartan and Northern Blizzard didn’t immediately return messages seeking comment.
Buyers can improve their rating by taking a number of steps, including posting a security, addressing existing abandonment obligations or selling assets, according to the regulator’s bulletin.
The move was a “chilling announcement on the first day of summer,” Carolyn Wright, a partner at law firm Burnet, Duckworth & Palmer in Calgary, wrote in a note on Tuesday, calling the development sudden and dramatic. “It is expected to have a chilling effect on the rise in transaction activity in a province struggling to get back on its feet following a two-year long rut in commodity prices.”
The Alberta regulator’s change, which doesn’t affect corporate takeovers, is meant to prevent asset deals in which the buyer risks adding to the so called orphan-well backlog. When bankrupt producers are unable to cover the costs of repairing lands where they pumped oil and gas, the Orphan Well Association, an industry group, becomes responsible for dealing with them at the expense of other companies.
But the regulatory shift may actually push more of the responsibility onto the Orphan Well Association, if struggling producers can’t find buyers for their assets and end up insolvent, said Pine Cliff’s Hodge.
Black Spruce’s Mottahed said he doesn’t expect the rule change will kill transactions altogether, but it could lead to more corporate takeovers or different kinds of financing arrangements, he said.
“People are left scratching their heads as to what’s going to be the outcome of this,” he said. “It’s certainly on the surface going to create less liquidity on the asset basis.”
 

sirkdev

Active VIP Member
Joined
Nov 2, 2008
Messages
3,127
Reaction score
4,970
Location
Stony Plain
This is huge..... the red water fiasco should have never happened to put tax payers on the hook for the liabilities of a long gone rich oil man is ridiculous. This is going to be a game changer in alberta, 72% yes thats right.. of the current 788 licensees in alberta could not transfer ownership of a well license tomorrow. This is a small/junior company killer.

I do believe there needs to be a better system for the reclamation of wells that are not economical to produce but this... right now holy man talk about another nail in the coffin.
 

Lem Lamb

Active VIP Member
Joined
Apr 5, 2010
Messages
3,667
Reaction score
6,654
Location
Lacombe AB
Not just the 722 wells alone, but malty 1000's across the Province sitting idle.

Yuppers, Alberta's are on the hook for major billing according too the W-5 or Fifth Estate Documentary a while back.
 

Lem Lamb

Active VIP Member
Joined
Apr 5, 2010
Messages
3,667
Reaction score
6,654
Location
Lacombe AB
Yuppers !

Us out-door folk who enjoy the right to use and respect our lands are referred to as evil do'ers at times.

Big oil and gas cry wolf since many of us see 150.000 plus abandon wells that will fall under the orphan well system that is under funded to clean up.

10 to 14 wells per year is all the fund can support because the new well licences donate a very small portion of funds to reclaim well sites,,, hopefully not leaving tax pay'ers too pick up tab in the mega millions in years too come.

Lots of news on this by CBC and other reputable firms too. Including the Energy regularity Board of Alberta.

The Waterton Nal Park well is still un claimed from the Turner Valley discovery days drill by the Dig-Man rig 2 if I recall. 75 years none the less.

I hope I'm more wrong then right. Pal Don
 
Last edited:

niner

Active VIP Member
Joined
Mar 14, 2009
Messages
8,082
Reaction score
57,615
Location
lacombe
I wonder if this law will apply to all the wind farms as well. I was told the life expectancy of a wind mill is 25 years. And then they abandon them.
 

LBZ

Active VIP Member
Joined
Apr 16, 2010
Messages
3,068
Reaction score
3,649
Location
Central Alberta
CBC is the Fox news of Canada. Far from reputable.
They are on the liberal government payroll. Remember that.

Also taxpayers don't pay for orphan wells themselves. They are payed for by the industry through various means of collection like licenses and their License Liability Rating (LLR) and the Liability Management Rating (LMR) under regulation overseen by the AER and OWA.

The OWA is governed by a board of directors:
-Canadian Association of Petroleum Producers, CAPP
-Explorers and Producers Association of Canada, EPAC
-Alberta Energy Regulators, AER

The government does have members of the ESRD on the board, but it's only 20% of the board. A small cost to the taxpayers as it's not the members full time jobs.
 
Last edited:

Lem Lamb

Active VIP Member
Joined
Apr 5, 2010
Messages
3,667
Reaction score
6,654
Location
Lacombe AB
Looks like assests of Red Water will not go towards cleaning up the well sites after all.

Alberta court rules insolvent oil company

Acouding to the court ruling that is.

I do hope that extra funds are collected to support the Orphan Well program in-stead of looking at tax payers in the artical above.

"We hope" the clean-up funds are there for these 70 well sites and the rest that need addressing in years to come.

Pal Don
 

LBZ

Active VIP Member
Joined
Apr 16, 2010
Messages
3,068
Reaction score
3,649
Location
Central Alberta
I don't think they will unless they become an environmental problem that the OWA can't cover the costs to address right away.

Also, orphan wells can be purchased by other oil companies if they meet the assessment criteria of the AER so some of those 700 wells could potentially be removed from the custody of the OWA.
 

Lem Lamb

Active VIP Member
Joined
Apr 5, 2010
Messages
3,667
Reaction score
6,654
Location
Lacombe AB
That's awesome as I'm glad there is a group that stays on top of this,,, way above my know how.

Friends and Relates threw out Western Canada have a few shut in wells that are still paying royalties on which is good, someday they might re-boot them too.

I'm sure it will all work out since the GOA is keeping a close eye on things now that its been brought up.

Pal Don
 
Top Bottom