Challenger x3.2

takethebounce · Apr 22, 2015

Who is going to order the new 3.2" challenger track?

Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

maxwell · Apr 22, 2015

Not me paddles inset too far. Hopefully it's 2.86 pitch so you can throw it right on a t3 should be lots of room

takethebounce · Apr 22, 2015

I read that it's 3.0 pitch for now.

Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

tstams · Apr 22, 2015

Where do u see this?

oler1234 · Apr 22, 2015

tstams said:
Where do u see this?

^^^ what he said.

edit... I don't understand why they would make a 3.2 tall version, most people don't even use their 3" to there full potential.

BeachSled · Apr 22, 2015

It was posted on Snowest by Tracks USA and Ron Kincaid also had it on his Facebook page today. Rob Kincaid

takethebounce · Apr 23, 2015

oler1234 said:
^^^ what he said.

edit... I don't understand why they would make a 3.2 tall version, most people don't even use their 3" to there full potential.

And most people use their 174 to the full potential?

I have heard two reports, one that is saying the track is 3.2" and the other saying it's just a new version of the 3" hence the 3.2. I believe either way, if they make it, people will buy it.

Still waiting for the soft/mid durometer 2.75" in the 15 wide.

Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

CUSO · Apr 23, 2015

I thought the T3 is a 3" pitch track and drivers. The track would be stupid heavy if it was 2.86"

Noticing those paddles being inset would be almost immeasurable IMO.

maxwell said:
Not me paddles inset too far. Hopefully it's 2.86 pitch so you can throw it right on a t3 should be lots of room

Modman · Apr 23, 2015

takethebounce said:
And most people use their 174 to the full potential?

I have heard two reports, one that is saying the track is 3.2" and the other saying it's just a new version of the 3" hence the 3.2. I believe either way, if they make it, people will buy it.

Still waiting for the soft/mid durometer 2.75" in the 15 wide.

Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

The new paddles are 3.2" tall from what I read, its not a 3.2 Version.

CUSO said:
I thought the T3 is a 3" pitch track and drivers. The track would be stupid heavy if it was 2.86"

Noticing those paddles being inset would be almost immeasurable IMO.

Its a 3.0 pitch and single ply.

Bnorth · Apr 23, 2015

maxwell said:
Not me paddles inset too far. Hopefully it's 2.86 pitch so you can throw it right on a t3 should be lots of room

CUSO said:
I thought the T3 is a 3" pitch track and drivers. The track would be stupid heavy if it was 2.86"

Noticing those paddles being inset would be almost immeasurable IMO.

Yeah the T3 is 3.00" pitch. I used a T3 shaft and drivers to do my camo extreme swap.

Lund · Apr 24, 2015

takethebounce said:
And most people use their 174 to the full potential?

I have heard two reports, one that is saying the track is 3.2" and the other saying it's just a new version of the 3" hence the 3.2. I believe either way, if they make it, people will buy it.

Still waiting for the soft/mid durometer 2.75" in the 15 wide.

Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

Isn't not your Polaris track a 2.6" lug?
2.6" lug is almost if your splitting hair 2 3/4" tall. I measured the one on KB test sled (cat) and their version of the 2.6 measures 2 3/4" on a tape. Noticeably taller then my CamoX 2.5 on my Tnytro.
Did you measure the lugs on your Pro.?

takethebounce · Apr 24, 2015

Lund said:
Isn't not your Polaris track a 2.6" lug?
2.6" lug is almost if your splitting hair 2 3/4" tall. I measured the one on KB test sled (cat) and their version of the 2.6 measures 2 3/4" on a tape. Noticeably taller then my CamoX 2.5 on my Tnytro.
Did you measure the lugs on your Pro.?

My current one is 2.4.

If you measure the new Pro tracks from inside the track yes they are almost 2.7. Since I do not have my hands on one I cannot go out and confirm.

Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

Teth-Air · Apr 24, 2015

takethebounce said:
Who is going to order the new 3.2" challenger track?

Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

I think I will hold out for the 4 inch.

takethebounce · Apr 24, 2015

Teth-Air said:
I think I will hold out for the 4 inch.

You need all you can get!

Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

Teth-Air · Apr 24, 2015

takethebounce said:
You need all you can get!

Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

Haha, I may not smash the bottom but I can sure can scorch the sides : )

takethebounce · Apr 24, 2015

Teth-Air said:
Haha, I may not smash the bottom but I can sure can scorch the sides : )

Not when you are following the might Doo 16" wides!

Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

Caper11 · Apr 24, 2015

maxwell said:
Not me paddles inset too far. Hopefully it's 3.00 pitch so you can throw it right on a t3 should be lots of room

Fixed it for yah.

Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

Rotax_Kid · Apr 24, 2015

Man could I trench myself into a bad spot with this....

Lund · Apr 24, 2015

takethebounce said:
My current one is 2.4.

If you measure the new Pro tracks from inside the track yes they are almost 2.7. Since I do not have my hands on one I cannot go out and confirm.

Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

Well that's interesting. The test unit KB had when i measured the lug height, i measured from the top of the track to the lug tip, 2 3/4". Not the inside of the track to lug tip.
The Cat track should be designated as a 2.75 and not a 2.6 imo.

mur190 · Apr 25, 2015

arctic cat measures lug and track where as camoplast measures lug only.

Challenger x3.2

Active VIP Member

Active VIP Member

Active VIP Member

Active VIP Member

Active VIP Member

Active VIP Member

Attachments

Active VIP Member

Active VIP Member

Active VIP Member

Active VIP Member

Active VIP Member

Active VIP Member

Active VIP Member

Active VIP Member

Active VIP Member

Active VIP Member

Active VIP Member

Active VIP Member

Active VIP Member

Active VIP Member

Similar threads