Understanding diesel exhaust aftertreatment systems

Summitric

SUPER COOL MOD & Supporting Vendor
Moderator
Joined
Oct 21, 2006
Messages
48,004
Reaction score
32,148
Location
Edmonton/Sherwood Park
Website
www.bumpertobumper.ca
by Allan Janssen

Understanding diesel exhaust aftertreatment systems​



Diesels have long had an image problem. They were known to be smelly, slow, and dirty.

But that picture is very much out of date. Diesels don’t stink like they used to. Many are extremely powerful. And they’re remarkably clean compared to the old days.

Cleaning up diesel’s act took some work. The breakthrough came with the development of diesel exhaust aftertreatment systems.
All internal combustion engines produce pollutants such as CO2, CO, HC, and oxides of nitrogen (NOx). Diesel exhaust, when untreated, also contains significant amounts of particulate matter (PM). Regulations enacted worldwide required significant reduction in all diesel pollutant levels beginning in the mid-2000s.

Chart1.png
For the U.S. market, the major emission reductions were implemented during the 2007 model year, on all diesel engines built after Jan. 1, 2007. Thanks to newly developed diesel exhaust aftertreatment systems, particulate matter was dramatically reduced.

Now that these systems are common and are making their way from dealerships to auto technicians everywhere, it would be good to review the basics of how these diesel exhaust aftertreatment systems work, how they can fail, and the effects of failures.

They are not preventive systems like exhaust gas recirculation (EGR) which reduces the formation of pollutants during the combustion process, or crankcase ventilation systems which prevent crankcase vapours from reaching the environment. Instead, diesel exhaust aftertreatment systems reduce pollutants after they have been produced.

The exhaust enters the diesel oxidizing catalyst (DOC) where HC and CO emission levels are reduced. This oxidizing process is similar to what occurred in the two-way catalysts on gas-powered cars of the mid-1970s. (Starting in the 1980s, gasoline vehicles employed a three-way catalyst that also lowered NOx emissions.)

Chart2.png


In the modern diesel exhaust aftertreatment system, diesel exhaust fluid (DEF) solution is injected into the exhaust stream in a spray of tiny droplets. The diameter of these droplets range from 100 to 200 µm. (For reference, a human hair ranges from about 25 to 181 μm in diameter.)

From there, the exhaust works its way through the selective catalytic reduction (SCR) catalyst, which uses the DEF to create a chemical reaction to reduce NOx emissions

Finally, the diesel particulate filter (DPF) traps PM to prevent it from entering the atmosphere.

Throughout, the system is chock-full of sensors to confirm and regulate proper operation.

Exhaust components​

While the DOC is not much different from the two-way catalyst on a 1977 Chevy Impala V8, the SCR is very different in construction and function from a typical catalytic converter. The SCR only reduces NOX and it cannot perform that function without the Diesel Exhaust Fluid (DEF) spray at the inlet side of the SCR.

The DEF solution spray vaporizes and decomposes to form ammonia and carbon dioxide. When the ammonia vapour is introduced to the NOx gas, it converts it to nitrogen and water – a harmless byproduct.

DEF is the reactant necessary for the functionality of the SCR system. It is a carefully blended aqueous urea solution of 32.5% high purity urea and 67.5% deionized water. (The DEF fluid is from the same family as urea fertilizer and bovine urine. But don’t try to collect your own fluid to save money. It won’t be of the proper purity or concentration. That’s no bull!)

DEF needs to be properly stored in a cool, dry, well-ventilated area, out of direct sunlight. At room temperature, DEF can be stored for two years. Keep it between -12 degrees C and 32 degrees C and it will last at least a year. Let that temperature rise above 32 C and the DEF shelf-life drops. So don’t buy a two-year supply at Costco and then store it in a greenhouse!

Clogged injector​

To keep someone from putting diesel in the DEF tank, the standard nozzle diameter for dispensing DEF has been designed at 19mm versus the standard diesel fuel nozzle diameter of 22mm. In addition, the cap for the DEF tank is blue to further differentiate it from the diesel tank.

However, as you might expect, some people have made the mistake of dropping DEF into the diesel tank. This will result in a stalled engine and a very expensive repair bill.

Problem areas of the DEF system include the DEF reductant pump, the tank heaters (DEF won’t flow if it freezes – and it will freeze at -11 degrees C), and the spray nozzle which can clog up with crystalline DEF. Either issue will cause DTCs and continued driving with DEF issues can put the vehicle into several levels of reduced power; the final level of reduced power will result in a top speed of about 8 km-h.

So tell your clients to keep that DEF tank full of fresh DEF and they won’t get into a ‘DEF jam.’

The last stop​

PM reduction – which most people think of as ‘soot’ – is probably the most visible part of the current diesel emission standards. Some of the particulates are reduced by precise control of fuel mixture, injection timing, and exhaust temperature. But any PM that makes it past everything else hits the diesel particulate filter (DPF).

That amazing piece of engineering can remove more than 90% of particulate matter carried in the exhaust gases. It uses a filter substrate consisting of thousands of porous cells to trap the bad stuff. And it keeps on being amazing right up until it gets plugged.

To prevent plugging – and the trouble codes and power loss associated with that – the system will automatically go through regeneration to “burn-off” the soot loading in the DPF.

The ECM/PCM monitors the amount of soot trapped in the DPF. Too much soot plugs the exhaust, triggers DTCs. If allowed to degrade too much, it will cause the vehicle to go into reduced power ‘limp’ mode.

On a scan tool you can see this soot accumulation expressed as either grams or percentage. When the number gets too high for the good of the system, the ECM/PCM will raise the temperature of the DPF. It will inject extra fuel into the exhaust stream via an extra injector. Or it will alter the injection timing. In some stationary-engine cases, it will employ electric heating elements. Either way, the elevated temperature will burn away the excess soot.

The automatic regeneration process typically happens with little fanfare. The driver may be totally unaware it is occurring. But if it doesn’t happen normally (engines that idle a long time or operate at low-power levels won’t be able to successfully perform a regeneration, resulting in high soot accumulation and DTCs), then you need to force regeneration via a manual “service regeneration.”

A scan tool is required for service regeneration. Commanding a service regeneration is accomplished using the output control function. The vehicle will need to be parked outside the facility and away from flammable materials, vegetation, other vehicles, and buildings, due to the high exhaust gas temperature at the tail pipe (around 315 degrees C).

The service regeneration can be terminated by applying the brake pedal, turning it off using the scan tool, or by simply disconnecting the scan tool from the vehicle.

Diesel exhaust aftertreatment systems have been a reality for more than a decade. With the information above and vehicle-specific procedures contained in Alldata’s OEM-level service information, you’ll be well on your way to servicing systems have been a reality for more than a decade. With the information above and vehicle-specific procedures contained in Alldata’s OEM-level service information, you’ll be well on your way to servicing today’s diesel cars and trucks.
 

JMCX

Active VIP Member
Joined
Dec 29, 2007
Messages
1,558
Reaction score
3,555
Location
Calgary
I prefer my clean burning, non stinking diesel. A regen uses about 10 litres of extra fuel l estimate. And happens once every 800km on my F350. That's about 8% extra in fuel due to regens. The DEF cost is pretty marginal. The cost of repairs to this system is stupid though and a delete is usually the way most people go.
 

banditelectric

Active VIP Member
Joined
Oct 31, 2009
Messages
225
Reaction score
614
Location
Caroline, Alberta, Canadia, Earth, Milkyway
I deleted my 2020 Cummins and was the best move honestly. Last year pulling exact same load on the same trip i gained an Extra 150+ KM to a tank. At the price of diesel right now that is a significant savings. I still am not convinced that the Carbon footprint that DEF itself creates vs not having it is saving the environment. Considering the carbon it takes to create the DEF, Transport the DEF, the extra fuel it uses to run the DEF system and not to mention the carboard box, plastic jug that it comes in being created as well as ending up in a landfill somewhere. Just my my hillibilly two cents on the subject.
 

JMCX

Active VIP Member
Joined
Dec 29, 2007
Messages
1,558
Reaction score
3,555
Location
Calgary
There's a reason nobody wants to hang out anywhere near the tailpipe of a non emissions truck. Some nasty stuff coming out of there. Does all the energy and materials that goes into making it clean make sense? I don't know.
 

lilduke

Active VIP Member
Joined
Sep 15, 2009
Messages
17,495
Reaction score
62,175
Location
Local
I dont want to hang out near any tail pipe, emissions controled or not.

Cant smell that chit when your in the cab going down the highway though.

If youre not going anywhere shut that POS off already lol
 

ABMax24

Active VIP Member
Joined
Sep 10, 2013
Messages
4,644
Reaction score
13,411
Location
Grande Prairie, Alberta, Canada
The emissions equipment on the newer trucks seems to be significantly more reliable than the older ones. I deleted my 2014 F350 while still under warranty because I was having issues with soot passing through the DPF, regens every 200km, and the local Ford dealers not wanting to look at the truck because the check engine light wasn't on. I miss not smelling diesel exhaust, and my fuel economy didn't improve very much at all after the delete.

My wife's 2018 Diesel Colorado is much better, it had a couple issues with the DEF lines freezing but GM had upgraded parts for these and replaced them under warranty. Otherwise the truck is quiet, doesn't stink, the tailpipe is as clean as the day it drove off the lot, only uses a jug of DEF every oil change, and still gets awesome fuel economy. My dad has a full size Duramax of the same year and hasn't had a single issue, and he gets way better fuel economy than my F350 does.
 

banditelectric

Active VIP Member
Joined
Oct 31, 2009
Messages
225
Reaction score
614
Location
Caroline, Alberta, Canadia, Earth, Milkyway
The emissions equipment on the newer trucks seems to be significantly more reliable than the older ones. I deleted my 2014 F350 while still under warranty because I was having issues with soot passing through the DPF, regens every 200km, and the local Ford dealers not wanting to look at the truck because the check engine light wasn't on. I miss not smelling diesel exhaust, and my fuel economy didn't improve very much at all after the delete.

My wife's 2018 Diesel Colorado is much better, it had a couple issues with the DEF lines freezing but GM had upgraded parts for these and replaced them under warranty. Otherwise the truck is quiet, doesn't stink, the tailpipe is as clean as the day it drove off the lot, only uses a jug of DEF every oil change, and still gets awesome fuel economy. My dad has a full size Duramax of the same year and hasn't had a single issue, and he gets way better fuel economy than my F350 does.
My 2020 Cummins had nothing but issues. Eventually they didn't want to fix it under warranty as well as they never had the parts.....didn't want to be stuck with a $95,000 paper weight as its my only vehicle at the moment so had to delete it with 25,000 KM on it.
 

sirkdev

Active VIP Member
Joined
Nov 2, 2008
Messages
3,121
Reaction score
4,952
Location
Stony Plain
Knock on wood.. the last 4 -6.7 fords have worked flawlessly. I am no greenie but I sure do notice when around a deleted truck now.
 

sledneck__11

Active VIP Member
Joined
Jan 16, 2011
Messages
1,543
Reaction score
5,202
Location
saskatchewan
My 17 and 11 f350s are deleted with a good clean tune next to no smoke on hard accelerations, fuel economy usually between 800-1000 kms per tank now, used to be 19-20 litre per 100 empty on ym 17 now i get that pullin a trailer, def is a joke and these new emmisions are killing the truckin indurstry used to get million plus miles on a motor now lucky to get half that
 

neilsleder

Active VIP Member
Joined
Oct 18, 2009
Messages
9,618
Reaction score
17,001
Location
Leduc Alberta
Knock on wood.. the last 4 -6.7 fords have worked flawlessly. I am no greenie but I sure do notice when around a deleted truck now.

It is nice! I can’t stand being stuff behind a 6leaker at a red light. These new ones you don’t smell them
 

old mountain man

Active VIP Member
Joined
Jan 17, 2010
Messages
436
Reaction score
679
Location
Whitecourt
one problem with deleting is it likely stops you from selling your used diesel south of the border. As your truck is worth more down there that causes a fairly large reduction in the value of your used truck.
 

sledneck__11

Active VIP Member
Joined
Jan 16, 2011
Messages
1,543
Reaction score
5,202
Location
saskatchewan
Your truck had a problem then unless winter city miles with a lifted truck. 19-20 per 100 empty? Something was wrong there. My leveled stock duramax gets 12/100km on the highway at 120km/hr over a long average. Deleted would be better for sure which I will do if it causes any problems, but I doubt I will get 10% better.
Leveled with 35s and best i ever got was 15-16 litres per 100 empty and only used on long trips not daily driven i bought a 11 ford dually and it was much better stock on fuel then the 17 but it is now deleted and is leveled now with same tune on 35s and is still better tjen tne 17 on fuel, buddies duramax was better on fuel them my ford forsure
 

S.W.A.T.

Active VIP Member
Joined
Apr 13, 2008
Messages
4,429
Reaction score
7,614
Location
Smithers
Leveled with 35s and best i ever got was 15-16 litres per 100 empty and only used on long trips not daily driven i bought a 11 ford dually and it was much better stock on fuel then the 17 but it is now deleted and is leveled now with same tune on 35s and is still better tjen tne 17 on fuel, buddies duramax was better on fuel them my ford forsure
What gear ratio was in them, there was a switch in 15/16 I think and many 3 choices in the dually if I'm correct, could be wrong though
 

Cheers

Active VIP Member
Joined
Feb 11, 2023
Messages
231
Reaction score
540
Location
BC
My dads 2021 duramax has emissions problems. And you cant even get parts to fix it.

My parents, and brother in law have had nothing but problems with their Chevy diesels.
I chose a Ford F350, but with the 7.3 gasoline engine, which so far has been trouble free, but is also only 9 months old.
 

lilduke

Active VIP Member
Joined
Sep 15, 2009
Messages
17,495
Reaction score
62,175
Location
Local
My parents, and brother in law have had nothing but problems with their Chevy diesels.
I chose a Ford F350, but with the 7.3 gasoline engine, which so far has been trouble free, but is also only 9 months old.

He finally got his fixed but took a few months
 
Top Bottom