Minister Phillips caught spinning tall tales about Bighorn consultations again

Summitric

SUPER COOL MOD & Supporting Vendor
Moderator
Joined
Oct 21, 2006
Messages
48,004
Reaction score
32,148
Location
Edmonton/Sherwood Park
Website
www.bumpertobumper.ca
Minister Phillips caught spinning tall tales about Bighorn consultations again
Licia Corbella
Updated: February 22, 2019


When it comes to the Bighorn park proposal, Alberta Environment Minister Shannon Phillips continues to struggle with the facts.She clearly hasn’t learned her lesson from last month’s fiasco, when opposition MLAs and members of the public called on Phillips to resign from cabinet after she was caught in her own web of untruths regarding why she cancelled public meetings about the NDP government’s plans to create four parks, four recreation areas and two public land-use zones in the vast wilderness region.Now, Indigenous leaders in the area say the minister’s claim that she met with the Sunchild First Nation last week is not true.First, a refresher. The Bighorn controversy started Jan. 5, when Phillips released a three-page statement saying she was cancelling scheduled public hearings in the area following “allegations of bullying, abuse and concerns over personal safety.”The next day she told reporters: “In conversation with both my senior officials and the RCMP, it was determined that at this point we can’t necessarily guarantee the safety of the public.”
The next day, however, I phoned the RCMP who said they had not heard of any threats or concerns with regard to the public hearings.On Jan. 9, RCMP spokesman Fraser Logan issued a written statement, saying: “Alberta RCMP did not provide any official advice to Alberta Environment and Parks regarding the Bighorn public consultations.”At about the same time that Logan sent out that statement, Phillips was talking to the media claiming that the RCMP had two open files on the alleged bullying and harassment.Later that day, she put out a tweet saying she “misspoke.”Now, in a written statement, Phillips states: “Last week, I held nation-to-nation meetings with Sunchild, Stoney, Alexis Sioux leaders and have nation-to-nation meetings scheduled in the coming days and weeks with O’Chiese and Ermineskin leadership as well as Treaty 6 Grand Chief Wilton Littlechild.”Joey Pete, a council member with the Sunchild First Nation, denies that the minister has met with any senior member of the reserve, located 40 kilometres northwest of Rocky Mountain House.“We never met yet,” said Pete, who says the Alberta government’s walk doesn’t match its talk on how it treats First Nations in this province.Seeking clarity on this contradiction, Phillips’ spokesperson wrote on Thursday: “Minister Phillips and Minister Feehan had a meeting with two Sunchild Councillors and the Band Manager last week on the issue of treaty rights and access to sacred sites in the Bighorn Country proposal.”Pete says Edwin Frencheater and a couple of other band councillors say they had a 10-minute phone call with Phillips on Feb. 13, but there was no meeting.“A phone call is not a meeting. It appears like she’s stretching the truth,” Pete said Thursday. “We are working out the details for a meeting on Monday. That will be our first meeting with Phillips.”Later on the day of the minister’s phone call, more than 250 Indigenous people along with about 50 other members of the greater community braved frigid temperatures in Rocky Mountain House to show the Alberta government they have no love for its plans to develop parks and wilderness areas in their backyard.“All of this government’s talk of reconciliation, respect and consultation is just that — talk. Their actions say something different. Their actions say the opposite,” Pete said Wednesday.Pete says members of the O’Chiese First Nation, Wesley First Nation, Big Horn, the Foothills Ojibway and others delivered speeches in -25 C temperatures to send a message to the NDP government.“We were never informed or consulted about what’s going on,” Pete said of the government’s plans for the public lands from the boundary of Banff National Park eastward toward Drayton Valley, which includes Clearwater County, most of Brazeau County and the current Bighorn Backcountry management area.
“First Nations didn’t know about these plans. Only about three or four weeks ago bureaucrats from the province came to our nation. They said they wanted to consult with us. We didn’t even give them a chance to do their slide show. Why were we being informed last?” he asked.Pete points out that you can’t call something a consultation if you’ve already drawn up your plans. “That’s an information session not a consultation, and that means this government has already broken its promises to consult with us as partners.”
Alberta Indigenous Relations Minister Richard FeehanJASON FRANSON / THE CANADIAN PRESSPete says that Indigenous Relations Minister Richard Feehan sat down with him and others in the community about one month ago and said: “I thought you guys would like it.”Feehan did not return several Postmedia calls over two days.“You don’t move forward on something that’s going to have that huge of an impact on us and everybody else in the area,” said Pete, “because you think we’re going to like it. If they put in these parks, picture a wall around Sunchild and O’Chiese First Nations.”That wall, he says, would cut Indigenous peoples off from their traditional way of life — where they currently hunt, fish, lay trap lines and perform cultural ceremonies and collect medicines.“It’s a way of life and you can’t take that away from us.”Pete says his nation has a treaty with the Crown, not the province.Phillips was not available for an interview but in a written statement released Wednesday said: “We are committed to forging a new partnership with First Nations when it comes to land use and conservation. While the online survey closed on February 15, meetings with First Nations leaders on the Bighorn Country proposal are ongoing.”At the Feb. 13 rally last week, Jason Nixon, the United Conservative MLA for Rimbey-Rocky Mountain House-Sundre, said if the NDP force through any of these parks before calling an election that must be held before the end of May, a UCP government would “not accept the sham process that happened and will immediately reverse it.”“It is clear tonight,” Nixon said at last week’s frigid meeting, “that our friends in the O’Chiese Nation, the Big Horn Nation, the Sunchild Nation, the Metis Nation, have not been consulted, minister, and you must consult with communities when you make these kinds of changes. You cannot sit up in your ivory tower in Edmonton and come and tell the people who live here how things are going to be. It will not be accepted,” he said to enthusiastic cheers.Clearly, the Bighorn file is very much a thorn in Phillips’ side — entirely of her own making.Licia Corbella is a Postmedia opinion columnist. lcorbella@postmedia.com

 

Ronaha

Active VIP Member
Joined
Dec 11, 2015
Messages
1,606
Reaction score
3,038
Location
Narnia
The natives are saying what we have been saying all along, but suddenly Shannon is listening? Shows who they really care about, and all for what?so 4 environmentalists in Canmore can feel a little extra elite.
 

LID

Active VIP Member
Joined
Aug 3, 2008
Messages
1,008
Reaction score
1,072
Location
Calgary and Rocky Mtns
As long as UCP repeal the mess once they get in
I don’t necessarily think they will. I hope they do but I’m worried

Even though they talk about it now, it’s a big deal and not real nice headlines “UCP cancels parks and cancels wilderness protections!”
Those are ugly headlines and will probably come with lawsuits where they could just wash their hands of it and move on. Probably won’t lose any seats due to the lack of action in the election on 4 years

They may not want the hassle once they have already won
 

luvz da mud

Active VIP Member
Joined
May 4, 2012
Messages
486
Reaction score
1,100
Location
E-town
As long as UCP repeal the mess once they get in
I don’t necessarily think they will. I hope they do but I’m worried

Im with ya on that, has anyone heard an official UCP position on the Bighorn debacle? I've tried looking a few times but came up with nothing.
 

09 arctic cat m8

Active VIP Member
Joined
Feb 18, 2011
Messages
1,027
Reaction score
1,184
Location
canada
I’ll bet the Indians will be allowed to quad hunt and fish but the rest of us won’t be allowed to do anything as it’s their “traditaional” rights
 

snopro

Active VIP Member
Joined
Mar 3, 2009
Messages
101,797
Reaction score
90,534
Location
Milo,Alberta
Im with ya on that, has anyone heard an official UCP position on the Bighorn debacle? I've tried looking a few times but came up with nothing.
Seeing that Jason Nixon is the only politician showing up at the townhalls and protests I would think they have an invested position?
 
Top Bottom