- Thread starter
- #341
Turblue
Active VIP Member
Nope....hopefully soon.
Sidewinder 174 build and season ride report
- Thread starter Turblue
- Start date
Pistonbroke
Active VIP Member
These are awesome charts! Are they 2018 or 2019? I run a '17 and always interested in effective upgrades.
- Thread starter
- #343
Turblue
Active VIP Member
Hopefully this works
https://drive.google.com/file/d/1-2AEZia93KSC-WtNnoUD7auqPlgeXHO-/view
https://drive.google.com/file/d/1-2AEZia93KSC-WtNnoUD7auqPlgeXHO-/view
Xmrider163
Active VIP Member
It works I have a copy of this on my email. Great info
Kibbels
Active VIP Member
Thank you Mr..
- Thread starter
- #346
Turblue
Active VIP Member
- Thread starter
- #348
Turblue
Active VIP Member
- Thread starter
- #349
Turblue
Active VIP Member
Ok I noticed something in the clutching specs between 17 to 18. The 17 uses 1-3 40deg and the 18 used 3-3 60 deg. I assumed 3-3 was was factory on the 17 and didn’t pay attention taking it apart. So when I installed the 13.3 mm 3.1g in the tip of the 8kc weight, I set the secondary to 3-3. I wonder if that’s why it wouldn’t make rpm, but that’s the spec for the 18. Weird. I guess I’ll find out soon.
I currently have the silver orange silver primary, 8lr weights loaded, secondary stock orange spring wound 3-3 with hi torque rollers.
My next combo is the s-o-s spring, 8kc with the 13.3mm tip weight and the secondary at 1-3 and 3-3 see what changes.
I want the clutching setup for tree riding, could care less about track speed on big open unless I’m heading to Sicamous.
- Thread starter
- #350
Turblue
Active VIP Member
Kibbels
Active VIP Member
Interesting fact find Shawn... yup prismatics is the product I use for my company stuff & sled..
Lund
Active VIP Member
3-3 at 60deg was my recommendation last season, after running numerous trial’s. If you read back in my thread you will find the clutch settings for the secondary. Yamaha did the change on their 18 and 19 models.
- Thread starter
- #353
Turblue
Active VIP Member
I missed that I guess....just assumed it was 3-3 in 17 also.
Andrew.renegade1000
Active VIP Member
How did you like the 8LR weights loaded up along with the 3-3 60 degrees secondary setting? I am going to be running that this year!
How did you like the lower engagement , also I’m on my stock track 162 unlike your 174
How did you like the lower engagement , also I’m on my stock track 162 unlike your 174
- Thread starter
- #355
Turblue
Active VIP Member
I haven’t tried them yet..hopefully soon.
Lund
Active VIP Member
I did not think you were going to run the 8LR weights ?? interesting
I don't think your going to like them over the 8KC for the type of riding you do. The 8KC are better suited for tree riding and slugging through the deep from what we came up with.
- Thread starter
- #357
Turblue
Active VIP Member
Curious to see what they feel like.
Andrew.renegade1000
Active VIP Member
Me Aswell, I love riding creeks and trees, but also love to pull some climbs . And shoot up small chutes and tree lines! Curious to see how I like it Aswell, first ride 27-29 in blue river and valemount, can’t wait
Lund
Active VIP Member
Me Aswell, I love riding creeks and trees, but also love to pull some climbs . And shoot up small chutes and tree lines! Curious to see how I like it Aswell, first ride 27-29 in blue river and valemount, can’t wait
It won't pull as hard in the low end because the 8LR don't have enough base weight compared to the 8KC but in the mid and top it will out pull the 8KC because of a flatter profile so will shift much harder
- Thread starter
- #360
Turblue
Active VIP Member
Have you tried 8KC with D rivet in the tip and sec 3-3? I’m not sure why it wouldn’t pull rpm. We were 7300’ heavy spring snow
Similar threads
