Side by side input....

-lenny- · Aug 6, 2014

That HiLifter looks sweet! Not what I'm looking for though.

To muddy the waters a bit, I looked at a Maverick. Nice looking machine, and a lot less utilitarian than the commander. Didn't get the dimensions though. Also, what would these be like to tow on a little flat deck behind a 35' 5th wheel? Assuming the 5th wheel has a decent hitch lol.

-lenny- · Aug 6, 2014

Maverick:
119" overall length
64" wide
74" tall
84" wheelbase
13" clearance
1300lbs dry

XP 900:
108" overall length
64" wide
73" tall
81.5" wheelbase
13" clearance
1204lbs dry

XP 1000:
119" overall length
64" wide
74" tall
90" wheelbase
13.5" clearance
1379lbs dry

Definitely leaning towards the 900....

rknight111 · Aug 6, 2014

I have the 1000 XP and love it. Fun machine and haven't had a problem down any trail yet. Thought it was going to be to wide but no. Went from a quad.

ImageUploadedByTapatalk1407368785.359569.jpg

ImageUploadedByTapatalk1407368812.699195.jpg

Toxic · Aug 6, 2014

900 rzr Xp is the one, the 800 doesn't have the power, the 1000 is to big physically. The Can am Sxs have a tendency to overheat but moving the rad and drilling a hole in thermostat would likely fix that, The Teryx looks decent but I have never seen enough to make a decent conclusion. Everything else is avoidable, Viking and pioneer are to wide, the cat has linkage problems and the single dumbest tie rod placement in the history of off road vehicles.

Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

rknight111 · Aug 6, 2014

Toxic said:
the 1000 is to big physically.

It's 1" wider and 11" longer, I would test drive both before you shell out the cash. I was going to buy the 900 then tried the 1000 and this answered my question,no comparison, I ended up with the 1000. less upgrades needed.

togo ripper · Aug 6, 2014

My brother has a commander 1000 rides great lots of power but I'd make sure to get power steering especially navigating tight twisting trails, inlaws have a teryx and interior just looks cheap and plain and uncle has a ranger 800 it seems under powered and top heavy my vote goes can am all reliable but I like can am the best seems like higher quality and great power

High Velocity · Aug 6, 2014

rknight111 said:
It's 1" wider and 11" longer, I would test drive both before you shell out the cash. I was going to buy the 900 then tried the 1000 and this answered my question,no comparison, I ended up with the 1000. less upgrades needed.

Couldn't agree more, Ron. I, too, was a little concerned about the physical size of the 1000 when I bought it. Now, 500 miles later, I have absolutely no regrets. The fun factor of this machine far outweighs any negatives....Wait ! There aren't any negatives !!

Sent from my iPad using Tapatalk HD

High Velocity · Aug 6, 2014

togo ripper said:
My brother has a commander 1000 rides great lots of power but I'd make sure to get power steering especially navigating tight twisting trails, inlaws have a teryx and interior just looks cheap and plain and uncle has a ranger 800 it seems under powered and top heavy my vote goes can am all reliable but I like can am the best seems like higher quality and great power

I got the chance to drive a Commander last week in B.C.. They are a nice machine with decent power, but I'll keep my RZR 1000. The Commander is much noisier in the cab because of engine placement and also gets a lot hotter in the cab, again, because of engine location. The clutching is much more performance-oriented in the RZR and the RZR's suspension is superior. These are points that both the Commander owner and I agreed on. The Commander has more storage and cargo capability as well as a more utility like seating position. The RZR 1000 sacrifices in these areas to achieve the goal of ultimate performance. Both are great machines, depending on your intended use.

Sent from my iPad using Tapatalk HD

togo ripper · Aug 6, 2014

Ya the commander is definitely more of a work horse than sport ride but we use ours around the farm a ton where a rzr or maverick would be useless just nice mix of both worlds and as for rzr they look like a great machine just never driven one so can't comment on it

deaner · Aug 6, 2014

Are the polaris 800s a bad engine? I have a ranger 800 that has been good to me but man it sounds awful. My brother is thinking of a rzr 800 but wondering if a guy should steer clear of them. Anything in particular to look for or avoid?

High Velocity · Aug 6, 2014

deaner, the Poo 800 is a great engine. Absolutely nothing to worry about. I know a number of people running these with thousands of miles on them.

Sent from my iPad using Tapatalk HD

camoJoe · Aug 7, 2014

Have a 2013 commander 1000 XT great machine lots of cargo space, very happy with it , lots of power when you need it, stock tires are all around good, except in deep mud, they dont clean out easy. As stated above it is a utility vehicle but is also a blast on the trails, yes it is noisy, but i dont hear a thing when on the trails, (lets the wildlife know i am coming ) for a utility vehicle it has a phenomenal ride, between the Ranger and the commander probably share top spot for utility performance, No brand bashing here, there are other brands that are coming out with some very nice machines, in the side by side class, They all are racing for top spot and suspect we will see some great changes in the next few years,... EG: Highlifter Edition Razor.

dooski · Aug 7, 2014

imdoo'n said:
On open trails the 900 or larger is going to be pretty entertaining. Any brand will do, What fits your purpose and riding style is up to you. 800's are good also kawaski teryx 4 seater, AC 700 trail cat will give the 900's a run for there money. So much brand bs on here, a recommendation is useless

You'e so full of s **t, bring that 700 cat out there an prove to me that you'll give the 900 a run for its money

honda450 · Aug 7, 2014

I have a 2011 900 xp and I love it. I run it at home out sand tires on it for the dunes. And tracks for the winter. Never had any issues whatsoever

dracer · Aug 8, 2014

I have a 570 and it's great goes everywhere I want to. Doesn't have the azz pucker factor tho like the 900 or 1k. I don't get into trouble it's very predictable can giv'r down trails at 65-70kph and not feel out of control and it can fit in your pick up truck. Think 900 50" would be great but could be tippy with that much jam don't buy an 800

deaner · Aug 9, 2014

How many hours or kilometers is high for these engines? I have 3700km and 270 hours on my ranger. Sorry for the highjack lenny, just seems like a great thread.

-lenny- · Aug 9, 2014

No hijack at all, I'm curious to know too. Definitely something I will be factoring into my eventual purchase.

pfi572 · Aug 9, 2014

Same as lenny , I have been snooping around and for the difference in a used one to new I think I will go new.
Just a bit nervous with the used as it is hard to tell if it has been sunk or filled with water at sometime.

neilsleder · Aug 9, 2014

pfi572 said:
Same as lenny , I have been snooping around and for the difference in a used one to new I think I will go new.
Just a bit nervous with the used as it is hard to tell if it has been sunk or filled with water at sometime.

The price most people want for there used stuff you are almost better off with new. Not sure why guys ask so much for there junk.

-lenny- · Aug 9, 2014

Used versus new is definitely a toss up with something like this. I change my mind all the time!

PS do SXS go up in value when used, like the XMs?
Lol.

Side by side input....

Active VIP Member

Active VIP Member

Administrator

Active member

Administrator

Active member

Active VIP Member

Active VIP Member

Active member

Active VIP Member

Active VIP Member

Active VIP Member

Active member

Active VIP Member

Member

Active VIP Member

Active VIP Member

Active VIP Member

Active VIP Member

Active VIP Member

Similar threads