Search and Rescue Funding up in the Air.

ferniesnow

I'm doo-ing it!
Joined
Dec 2, 2008
Messages
108,772
Reaction score
83,080
Location
beautiful, downtown Salmon Arm, BC
Was there an increase in the Parks budget? Rumor has it that a lot of areas are going to be closed for caribou rehabilitation, Park formation, and the concept of Connectivity. SAR won't be required as much as it is now.
 

moyiesledhead

Active VIP Member
Joined
Oct 12, 2008
Messages
5,431
Reaction score
10,761
Location
Moyie B.C.
With any luck at all this will effect the NDP and Green voting leaf lickers getting lost on the north shore hiking trails first. Poetic justice.
 

arff

Active VIP Member
Joined
Apr 21, 2009
Messages
139,365
Reaction score
55,097
Location
Leduc
Wow cut out SAR, that is crazy
 

Dawizman

Active VIP Member
Joined
Feb 24, 2014
Messages
2,821
Reaction score
9,999
Location
Cold Lake, AB
From what i understand, the funding for SAR rescue missions is still guaranteed, it's the funding for training, public education, and certain equipment like rope.

The SAR groups were aware that the $15M was a one time grant.

As one SAR member stated;

As a member of a Search and Rescue unit, I am greatly disappointed in BCSARA's response in the article and radio segment for their lack of clarity.

Jim McAllister should have been clear that the Alternative Support Model (ASM) funding model that BCSARA proposed to the province does NOT directly impact our ability or willingness to respond to searches. The two subjects are not related. When SAR groups are tasked to look for someone we are reimbursed by the province through Emergency Management of BC. Additionally, as I read the comments, as a group, we are opposed to the notion of user-pay rescue systems.

Also, all SAR groups knew that the $15M that we shared over the last three years was always a one-time thing. For many groups, that money went to training, or capital and key equipment purchases. SAR groups still have access to BC Gaming grants for said training, minor equipment purchase, occasionally capital equipment, and even some operational costs.

Bottom line, the public should have no concerns: SAR volunteers will be there when asked to help. Period.
 

gunner3006

Active VIP Member
Joined
Dec 19, 2014
Messages
11,835
Reaction score
10,091
Location
grande prairie
Anyone here have any numbers provided for STARS is Alberta. How much they receive? I know they do lots of fundraising.
 

Cdnfireman

Active VIP Member
Joined
Sep 11, 2012
Messages
2,726
Reaction score
9,527
Location
Alberta
With all the taxes we pay you’d think that the government would at least cover the full equipment costs incurred by the volunteer organizations and their personnel. It’s bad enough that volunteers have to step up and provide a service that should be a government responsibility, they should at least be equipped with the best equipment available and paid well to do what they do. It’s the professionalism, pride and effort of these people that saves lives and prevents tragedies.
Its a disgrace that the government treats this as an afterthought
 

Bnorth

Active VIP Member
Joined
Dec 18, 2010
Messages
10,542
Reaction score
20,096
Location
Salmon Arm
I joined SAR to rescue people and train to rescue people not waste hundreds of hours applying for grants or fundraising.
 

ferniesnow

I'm doo-ing it!
Joined
Dec 2, 2008
Messages
108,772
Reaction score
83,080
Location
beautiful, downtown Salmon Arm, BC
I joined SAR to rescue people and train to rescue people not waste hundreds of hours applying for grants or fundraising.

Absolutely. The training segment should not be cut. How can members be recruited without adequate training. You know yourself about the small number of SAR personnel who can ride a sled and actually get out in the back-country and be effective. On-going training is very important for the objectives of SAR to be carried out in an efficient and safe manner.
 
Top Bottom