Jan 23, 2017 #1 doorfx Active VIP Member Joined Jan 10, 2011 Messages 10,050 Reaction score 24,523 Location calgary ab
Jan 23, 2017 #2 M Mountainman52 Active VIP Member Joined Dec 17, 2012 Messages 868 Reaction score 1,785 Location BIS Well looks like there is not going to be an 860 as some were saying in the other 2018 AC thread ! I wondering what it will make for HP ?
Well looks like there is not going to be an 860 as some were saying in the other 2018 AC thread ! I wondering what it will make for HP ?
Jan 24, 2017 #3 C Catman13 Active member Joined Dec 28, 2012 Messages 120 Reaction score 108 Location Vegreville 1. Hollow jack shaft to save weight, uh oh. Memories of Polaris's attempt. 2. Weight loss from thinner tank skin is good idea. 3. Ugly Color. Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
1. Hollow jack shaft to save weight, uh oh. Memories of Polaris's attempt. 2. Weight loss from thinner tank skin is good idea. 3. Ugly Color. Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
Jan 26, 2017 #4 I iceman5689 Active VIP Member Joined Oct 25, 2009 Messages 948 Reaction score 989 Location Hilltop Mtn Could they have not called their motor anything closer to the Etec
Jan 26, 2017 #5 LBZ Active VIP Member Joined Apr 16, 2010 Messages 3,068 Reaction score 3,649 Location Central Alberta 91 octane minimum. Also noticed they said oil consumption reduced under 7000 rpm. At least they don't just say "uses less oil" like one of their competitors does which isn't a fair statement to make.
91 octane minimum. Also noticed they said oil consumption reduced under 7000 rpm. At least they don't just say "uses less oil" like one of their competitors does which isn't a fair statement to make.